Home / AP® Exam / AP® Physics 1 / AP Physics 1- 2.7 Kinetic and Static Friction – Exam Style questions – FRQs

AP Physics 1- 2.7 Kinetic and Static Friction - Exam Style questions - FRQs- New Syllabus

Kinetic and Static Friction AP  Physics 1 FRQ

Unit: 2. Force and Translational  Dynamics

Weightage : 10-15%

AP Physics 1 Exam Style Questions – All Topics

Question

A student wants to determine the coefficient of static friction between a long, flat wood board and a small wood block.
(a) Describe an experiment for determining the coefficient of static friction between the wood board and the wood block. Assume equipment usually found in a school physics laboratory is available.
i. Draw a diagram of the experimental setup of the board and block. In your diagram, indicate each quantity that would be measured and draw or state what equipment would be used to measure each quantity.
ii. Describe the overall procedure to be used, including any steps necessary to reduce experimental uncertainty. Give enough detail so that another student could replicate the experiment.
(b) Derive an equation for the coefficient of static friction in terms of quantities measured in the procedure from part (a).
A physics class consisting of six lab groups wants to test the hypothesis that the coefficient of static friction between the board and the block equals the coefficient of kinetic friction between the board and the block. Each group determines the coefficients of kinetic and static friction between the board and the block. The groups’ results are shown below, with the class average indicated in the bottom row.
Lab Group NumberCoefficient of Kinetic FrictionCoefficient of Static Friction
\(1\)\(0.45\)\(0.54\)
\(2\)\(0.46\)\(0.52\)
\(3\)\(0.42\)\(0.56\)
\(4\)\(0.43\)\(0.55\)
\(5\)\(0.74\)\(0.23\)
\(6\)\(0.44\)\(0.54\)
Average\(0.49\)\(0.49\)
(c) Based on these data, what conclusion should the students make about the hypothesis that the coefficients of static and kinetic friction are equal?
_____ The static and kinetic coefficients are equal.
_____ The static and kinetic coefficients are not equal.
Briefly justify your reasoning.
(d) A metal disk is glued to the top of the wood block. The mass of the block-disk system is twice the mass of the original block. Does the coefficient of static friction between the bottom of the block and the board increase, decrease, or remain the same?
_____ Increase      _____ Decrease      _____ Remain the same
Briefly state your reasoning.

Most-appropriate topic codes (AP Physics \(1\)):

• Topic \(2.2\) — Forces and Free-Body Diagrams (Part \( \mathrm{(a)} \), Part \( \mathrm{(b)} \))
• Topic \(2.5\) — Newton’s Second Law (Part \( \mathrm{(b)} \))
• Topic \(2.7\) — Kinetic and Static Friction (Part \( \mathrm{(a)} \), Part \( \mathrm{(b)} \), Part \( \mathrm{(c)} \), Part \( \mathrm{(d)} \))
▶️ Answer/Explanation

(a)(i)
A valid setup is an adjustable inclined board with the wood block resting on it. Slowly raise one end of the board until the block just begins to slide.

Measure the angle \(\theta\) that the board makes with the horizontal using a protractor or angle-measuring app. The measured quantity is the critical angle \(\theta\), the angle at which the block is just about to move.

A simple diagram should show the board tilted at angle \(\theta\), the block on the board, and a protractor used to measure \(\theta\).

(a)(ii)
Place the block at rest on the board. Slowly lift one end of the board until the block just begins to slide. Record the angle \(\theta\) at that instant.

To reduce uncertainty, repeat the trial several times and use the average value of \(\theta\). The block can also be placed at different locations on the board to check that the result is not caused by one unusual rough or smooth section of the board.

(b)
At the instant the block is just about to slide, static friction is at its maximum value.

Along the direction parallel to the incline:

\(mg\sin\theta=f_s\)

At the threshold of slipping,

\(f_s=f_{s,\max}=\mu_sN\)

Perpendicular to the incline:

\(N=mg\cos\theta\)

Substitute into the parallel-force equation:

\(mg\sin\theta=\mu_smg\cos\theta\)

Divide both sides by \(mg\cos\theta\):

\(\mu_s=\dfrac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta}\)

\(\boxed{\mu_s=\tan\theta}\)

(c)
\(\boxed{\text{The static and kinetic coefficients are not equal.}}\)

Group \(5\) is an outlier because its kinetic friction value, \(0.74\), is much larger than the other kinetic friction values, and its static friction value, \(0.23\), is much smaller than the other static friction values.

If group \(5\) is removed, the remaining groups show a consistent pattern: the static friction coefficient is about \(0.52\) to \(0.56\), while the kinetic friction coefficient is about \(0.42\) to \(0.46\). Therefore, the data support the conclusion that the coefficients are different.

(d)
\(\boxed{\text{Remain the same}}\)

The coefficient of static friction is a property of the two surfaces in contact. Since the same wood block bottom is still in contact with the same wood board, the coefficient \(\mu_s\) does not depend on the mass of the block-disk system.

Adding the metal disk increases the normal force and therefore increases the maximum static friction force, since \(f_{s,\max}=\mu_sN\). However, the coefficient \(\mu_s\) itself remains the same.

Scroll to Top