AP Physics 1- 5.6 Newton’s Second Law in Rotational Form - Exam Style questions - FRQs- New Syllabus
Newton’s Second Law in Rotational Form AP Physics 1 FRQ
Unit 5: Torque and Rotational Dynamics
Weightage : 10-15%
Question




Most-appropriate topic codes (AP Physics 1):
• Topic \( 5.4 \) — Torque and the Second Condition of Equilibrium (Part \( \mathrm{(b)} \), Part \( \mathrm{(c)} \), Part \( \mathrm{(d)} \))
• Topic \( 5.5 \) — Rotational Equilibrium and Newton’s First Law in Rotational Form (Part \( \mathrm{(b)} \), Part \( \mathrm{(c)} \))
• Topic \( 5.6 \) — Newton’s Second Law in Rotational Form (Part \( \mathrm{(c)} \), Part \( \mathrm{(e)} \))
• Topic \( 6.2 \) — Torque and Work (Part \( \mathrm{(e)} \))
▶️ Answer/Explanation
(a)
Three forces act on the beam:
\( \bullet \) The gravitational force \( F_g = Mg \), acting downward at the center of the beam
\( \bullet \) The tension force \( F_T \), acting at the right end of the beam along the string, directed upward and leftward
\( \bullet \) The hinge force \( F_H \), acting at the hinge
A correct free-body diagram therefore has one downward arrow at the center, one up-left arrow at the right end, and one force arrow at the hinge.

(b)
\( \boxed{F_{T2} > F_{T1}} \)
The beam remains horizontal and in rotational equilibrium in both cases, so the torque produced by the string must balance the torque produced by the beam’s weight.
When the string is attached lower on the wall, the angle \( \theta \) becomes smaller. That means the perpendicular component of the tension is smaller for the same tension. To produce the same balancing torque, the tension must therefore be larger.
So a smaller string angle requires a larger tension.
(c)
Start with Newton’s second law for rotation:
\( \sum \tau = I\alpha \)
Since the beam is in equilibrium,
\( \alpha = 0 \qquad \Rightarrow \qquad \sum \tau = 0 \)
Take torques about the hinge so the hinge force produces no torque.
The torque due to the tension has magnitude
\( \tau_T = (F_T \sin\theta)L \)
because the tension acts at the end of the beam, a distance \( L \) from the hinge, and only the perpendicular component contributes.
The torque due to the beam’s weight has magnitude
\( \tau_g = Mg\left(\dfrac{L}{2}\right) \)
because the weight acts at the center of mass of the uniform beam, halfway along its length.
Setting the net torque equal to zero:
\( (F_T \sin\theta)L – Mg\left(\dfrac{L}{2}\right) = 0 \)
\( (F_T \sin\theta)L = Mg\left(\dfrac{L}{2}\right) \)
Cancel \( L \):
\( F_T \sin\theta = \dfrac{Mg}{2} \)
Therefore,
\( \boxed{F_T = \dfrac{Mg}{2\sin\theta}} \)
This result shows that the tension depends inversely on \( \sin\theta \).
(d)
Yes, the derived equation is consistent with the reasoning in part \( \mathrm{(b)} \).
From \( F_T = \dfrac{Mg}{2\sin\theta} \), the tension is inversely proportional to \( \sin\theta \). When the string is attached lower, the angle decreases from \( \theta_1 \) to \( \theta_2 \), so \( \sin\theta \) becomes smaller.
A smaller denominator makes \( F_T \) larger, so the equation predicts \( F_{T2} > F_{T1} \), exactly matching the qualitative argument in part \( \mathrm{(b)} \).
(e)
The angular speed starts at \( 0 \) when the string is cut, then increases as the beam falls.
The graph should be monotonically increasing and concave down.
Early in the motion, the beam speeds up quickly because the gravitational torque is relatively large. As the beam approaches vertical, the lever arm of the weight decreases, so the torque and angular acceleration decrease. Therefore the angular speed continues to increase, but at a decreasing rate.

