AP Precalculus -2.5 Exponential Function Modeling- FRQ Exam Style Questions - Effective Fall 2023
AP Precalculus -2.5 Exponential Function Modeling- FRQ Exam Style Questions – Effective Fall 2023
AP Precalculus -2.5 Exponential Function Modeling- FRQ Exam Style Questions – AP Precalculus- per latest AP Precalculus Syllabus.
Question
Most-appropriate topic codes (AP Precalculus CED):
• 1.2: Rates of Change – part B(i), B(ii)
• 2.3: Exponential Functions – part B(iii)
• 1.13: Function Model Selection and Assumption Articulation – part C
▶️ Answer/Explanation
(A)(i) Equations
Substituting the points \((1, 3)\) and \((5, 89)\) into \(H(t) = ab^t\):
1. \(3 = ab^1\) (or \(3 = ab\))
2. \(89 = ab^5\)
(A)(ii) Values for a and b
Dividing equation 2 by equation 1: \(\frac{ab^5}{ab} = \frac{89}{3} \implies b^4 = 29.67\).
Solving for \(b\): \(b = (29.67)^{0.25} \approx 2.33\).
Solving for \(a\): \(a = \frac{3}{2.33} \approx 1.29\).
(B)(i) Average Rate of Change
\(\text{Rate} = \frac{H(5) – H(1)}{5 – 1} = \frac{89 – 3}{4} = \frac{86}{4} = 21.5\)
Answer: 21.5 feet per week.
(B)(ii) Interpretation
The answer indicates that between the first and fifth weeks, the bamboo tree grew at an average speed of 21.5 feet per week.
(B)(iii) Comparison
Greater. The function represents exponential growth (\(b > 1\)), which is concave up. This means the rate of growth increases over time, so the rate after week 5 will be steeper than the rate before week 5.
(C) Confidence
\(t = 4\) weeks.
The biologists should be more confident in \(t=4\) because it is an interpolation (within the observed data range). \(t=11\) is an extrapolation; biological growth cannot remain exponential indefinitely, so the model is likely inaccurate that far out.
Question
An ecologist began studying a certain type of plant species in a wetlands area in 2013. In 2015 ($t=2$), there were 59 plants. In 2021 ($t=8$), there were 118 plants.
The number of plants in this species can be modeled by the function $P$ given by $P(t)=ab^t$, where $P(t)$ is the number of plants during year $t$, and $t$ is the number of years since 2013.
(i) Use the given data to write two equations that can be used to find the values for constants $a$ and $b$ in the expression for $P(t)$.
(ii) Find the values for $a$ and $b$ as decimal approximations.
(i) Use the given data to find the average rate of change of the number of plants, in plants per year, from $t=2$ to $t=8$ years. Express your answer as a decimal approximation. Show the computations that lead to your answer.
(ii) Use the average rate of change found in (i) to estimate the number of plants for $t=10$ years. Show the work that leads to your answer.
(iii) The average rate of change found in (i) can be used to estimate the number of plants during year $t$ for $t>10$ years. Will these estimates, found using the average rate of change, be less than or greater than the number of plants predicted by the model $P$ during year $t$ for $t>10$ years? Explain your reasoning.
For which $t$-value, $t=6$ years or $t=20$ years, should the ecologist have more confidence in when using the model $P$? Give a reason for your answer in the context of the problem.
Most-appropriate topic codes (AP Precalculus CED):
• 1.2: Rates of Change – part B
• 1.3: Rates of Change in Linear and Quadratic Functions – part B(ii), B(iii)
• 1.13: Function Model Selection and Assumption Articulation – part C
▶️ Answer/Explanation
A (i)
Because $P(2)=59$ and $P(8)=118$, the two equations to find $a$ and $b$ are $ab^2=59$ and $ab^8=118$.
✅ Answer: $\boxed{ab^2=59 \text{ and } ab^8=118}$
A (ii)
Divide the second equation by the first: $\frac{ab^8}{ab^2} = \frac{118}{59} \implies b^6 = 2$.
$b = (2)^{1/6} \approx 1.122462$.
Substitute $b$ back into the first equation: $a = \frac{59}{b^2} \approx 46.828331$.
✅ Answer: $\boxed{a \approx 46.828, \; b \approx 1.122}$
B (i)
Average Rate of Change = $\frac{P(8)-P(2)}{8-2}$.
Calculation: $\frac{118-59}{6} = \frac{59}{6} \approx 9.833$.
✅ Answer: The average rate of change is $\boxed{9.833 \text{ plants per year}}$.
B (ii)
We can model this estimation using the point-slope form of the secant line: $y = P(2) + r(x-2)$, where $r \approx 9.833$.
For $t=10$: $y = 59 + 9.833(10-2) = 137.667$.
✅ Answer: The number of plants for $t=10$ years was approximately $\boxed{137 \text{ or } 138}$.
B (iii)
The estimate is less than the predicted model value.
Reasoning: The estimate using the average rate of change corresponds to the $y$-coordinate of a point on the secant line that passes through $(2, P(2))$ and $(8, P(8))$. Because an exponential growth graph like $P$ is concave up on the interval $(-\infty, \infty)$, the secant line lies below the curve outside of the interval $(2,8)$. Thus, for $t>10$, the secant line estimate represents an underprediction.
C
The ecologist should have more confidence in using the model for $t=6$ years.
Reasoning: It is appropriate to use the regression model to interpolate values at times that fall between the minimum time ($t=2$) and the maximum time ($t=8$) provided in the data. However, there is insufficient information to know how many years the exponential model can be reliably extended beyond $t=8$ to make reasonable predictions (extrapolation involves more risk and uncertainty).
Question
(i) Use the given data to write two equations that can be used to find the values for constants \(a\) and \(b\) in the expression for \(P(t)\).
(ii) Find the values for \(a\) and \(b\) as decimal approximations.
(i) Use the given data to find the average rate of change of the number of bacteria, in bacteria per hour, from \(t = 2\) to \(t = 6\) hours. Express your answer as a decimal approximation. Show the computations that lead to your answer.
(ii) Use the average rate of change in (i) to estimate the number of bacteria for \(t = 9\) hours. Show the computations that lead to your answer.
(iii) The average rate of change found in (i) can be used to estimate the number of bacteria during hour \(t\) for \(t > 9\) hours. Will these estimates, found using the average rate of change, be less than or greater than the number of bacteria predicted by the model during the hour \(t\) for \(t > 9\) hours? Explain your reasoning.
Most-appropriate topic codes (AP Precalculus CED):
• 1.2: Rates of Change – part B
• 1.3: Rates of Change in Linear and Quadratic Functions – part B(ii), B(iii)
• 1.13: Function Model Selection and Assumption Articulation – part C
▶️ Answer/Explanation
A (i)
Using the model \(P(t) = ab^t\): From the data, \(P(2) = 32\) and \(P(6) = 115\).
The two equations are: \[ ab^2 = 32 \] \[ ab^6 = 115 \]
✅ Answer: The system of equations is \(ab^2 = 32\) and \(ab^6 = 115\).
A (ii)
Divide the second equation by the first: \[ \frac{ab^6}{ab^2} = \frac{115}{32} \implies b^4 = \frac{115}{32} \] Taking the positive fourth root (since \(b > 0\)): \[ b = \left(\frac{115}{32}\right)^{1/4} \approx 1.377 \] Substitute \(b\) into the first equation: \[ a(1.377)^2 = 32 \implies a \approx \frac{32}{1.896} \approx 16.880 \]
✅ Answer: \(a \approx 16.880\), \(b \approx 1.377\).
B (i)
The average rate of change (AROC) of \(P\) from \(t=2\) to \(t=6\) is: \[ \frac{P(6) – P(2)}{6 – 2} = \frac{115 – 32}{4} = \frac{83}{4} = 20.75 \]
✅ Answer: The average rate of change is \(20.75\) bacteria per hour.
B (ii)
Using the AROC, the change in bacteria from \(t=2\) to \(t=9\) is approximated by \(20.75 \times (9-2) = 20.75 \times 7 = 145.25\). Estimated number of bacteria at \(t=9\): \[ P(9) \approx P(2) + 145.25 = 32 + 145.25 = 177.25 \] Since bacteria count is discrete, this is approximately 177 or 178 bacteria.
✅ Answer: Approximately 177 bacteria.
B (iii)
The model \(P(t)=ab^t\) is an exponential growth function. Exponential functions are concave up. The secant line used for the AROC estimate lies below the graph of a concave up function. Therefore, linear estimates based on the secant line will be less than the actual values predicted by the model.
✅ Answer: The estimates using the average rate of change will be less than the number of bacteria predicted by the model, because the exponential model is concave up, placing the secant line below the curve.
C
Interpolation (estimating between known data points) is generally more reliable than extrapolation (estimating beyond the range of data). The value \(t=4\) lies within the interval \([2, 6]\) used to build the model, while \(t=15\) lies far outside this interval. The behavior of the bacteria may change over longer periods, making the model less reliable.
✅ Answer: The scientist should have more confidence at \(t = 4\) hours because 4 is between the given data points (interpolation), whereas 15 is outside the known range (extrapolation).
Question
(B) (i) Find the average rate of change from \(t = 0\) to \(t = 4\). Explain its meaning.
(ii) Will the average rate of change from \(t = 4\) to \(t = t_a\) (with \(t_a > 4\)) be greater or less than that from \(t = 0\) to \(t = 4\)? Justify.
(C) As \(t \to \infty\), does the model make sense contextually? Why or why not?
Most-appropriate topic codes (AP Precalculus CED):
• 1.2: Rates of Change – part (B)(i), (B)(ii)
• 2.3: Exponential Functions – part (B)(ii)
• 3.2: Apply numerical results in a given mathematical or applied context – part (B)(i), (C)
• 3.3: Support conclusions or choices with a logical rationale or appropriate data – part (B)(ii), (C)
▶️ Answer/Explanation
(A) Exponential model \(P(t) = ae^{bt}\)
- Given: \(P(1) = 145\), \(P(2) = 115\).
- Divide the equations: \(\frac{P(2)}{P(1)} = \frac{115}{145} = \frac{23}{29} \approx 0.7931 = e^{b(2-1)} = e^b\).
- So \(b = \ln\left(\frac{23}{29}\right) \approx \ln(0.7931) \approx -0.2318\).
- Use \(P(1) = ae^{b\cdot1} = 145\): \(a = 145 \cdot e^{-b} = 145 \cdot \frac{29}{23} \approx 145 \cdot 1.2609 \approx 182.83\).
- Alternatively, compute directly: \(a = P(1) e^{-b} = 145 \cdot \frac{29}{23} = \frac{145 \cdot 29}{23} = \frac{4205}{23} \approx 182.826\).
- Thus, \(P(t) \approx 182.826 e^{-0.2318 t}\).
(B) i. Average rate of change from \(t = 0\) to \(t = 4\)
- \(P(0) = a \approx 182.826\).
- \(P(4) = 182.826 e^{-0.2318 \cdot 4} \approx 182.826 e^{-0.9272} \approx 182.826 \cdot 0.3956 \approx 72.34\).
- Average rate = \(\frac{P(4) – P(0)}{4 – 0} \approx \frac{72.34 – 182.826}{4} = \frac{-110.486}{4} \approx -27.622\) pellets per minute.
- Meaning: On average over the first 4 minutes, the dog ate about 27.6 pellets per minute.
(B) ii. Comparison of average rates
- For an exponential decay \(P(t) = ae^{bt}\) with \(b < 0\), the function is decreasing and concave up (since \(P”(t) = ab^2 e^{bt} > 0\)).
- In a concave up decreasing function, the average rate of change over an interval decreases in magnitude (becomes less negative) as the interval moves to the right.
- Thus, the average rate from \(t = 4\) to \(t = t_a\) will be greater (less negative) than that from \(t = 0\) to \(t = 4\).
- Reason: The instantaneous rate (derivative) is negative but increasing (becoming less negative), so later intervals have a smaller rate of loss.
(C) Limit as \(t \to \infty\)
- \(\lim_{t \to \infty} P(t) = \lim_{t \to \infty} ae^{bt} = 0\) because \(b < 0\).
- Context: The model predicts the pellets approach zero but never actually reach it. In reality, the dog will finish all pellets in finite time, so the model is not perfectly accurate for very large \(t\). However, it is a good approximation for the decay process while pellets remain.
- Thus, the model does not fully make sense as \(t \to \infty\) because it predicts the dog never finishes, while in reality the bowl becomes empty at some finite time.
Question

(i) Use the given data to write three equations that can be used to find the values for constants \( a \), \( b \), and \( c \) in the expression for \( D(t) \).
(ii) Find the values for \( a \), \( b \), and \( c \) as decimal approximations.
(i)Use the given data to find the average rate of change of the total number of plays for the song, in thousands per month, from \( t = 0 \) to \( t = 4 \) months. Express your answer as a decimal approximation. Show the computations that lead to your answer.
(ii) Use the average rate of change found in part B (i) to estimate the total number of plays for the song, in thousands, for \( t = 1.5 \) months. Show the work that leads to your answer.
(iii) Let \( A_t \) represent the estimate of the total number of plays for the song, in thousands, using the average rate of change found in part B (i). For \( A_{1.5} \) found in part B (ii), it can be shown that \( A_{1.5} < D(1.5) \). Explain why, in general, \( A_t < D(t) \) for all \( t \), where \( 0 < t < 4 \). Your explanation should include a reference to the graph of \( D \) and its relationship to \( A_t \).
Most-appropriate topic codes (AP Precalculus 2024):
• 1.2: Compare rates of change using average rates of change — part B(i)
• 2.5: Construct a model for situations involving proportional output values — part B(ii)
• 1.3: Determine the change in average rates of change for quadratic functions — part B(iii)
• 1.13: Articulate model assumptions and domain restrictions — part C
▶️ Answer/Explanation
A.
(i)
Because \( D(0) = 25 \), \( D(2) = 30 \), and \( D(4) = 34 \), the three equations are: \[ \begin{align*} a(0)^2 + b(0) + c &= 25 \\ a(2)^2 + b(2) + c &= 30 \\ a(4)^2 + b(4) + c &= 34 \end{align*} \] These simplify to: \[ \begin{align*} c &= 25 \quad \text{(1)} \\ 4a + 2b + c &= 30 \quad \text{(2)} \\ 16a + 4b + c &= 34 \quad \text{(3)} \end{align*} \] ✅ Answer: \(\boxed{c=25, \; 4a+2b+c=30, \; 16a+4b+c=34}\)
(ii)
Substitute \( c = 25 \) into (2) and (3): \[ \begin{align*} 4a + 2b &= 5 \quad \text{(2′)} \\ 16a + 4b &= 9 \quad \text{(3′)} \end{align*} \] Multiply (2′) by 2: \( 8a + 4b = 10 \).
Subtract this from (3′): \( (16a+4b) – (8a+4b) = 9 – 10 \) gives \( 8a = -1 \), so \( a = -\frac{1}{8} = -0.125 \).
Substitute into (2′): \( 4(-0.125) + 2b = 5 \) gives \( -0.5 + 2b = 5 \), so \( 2b = 5.5 \), \( b = 2.75 \).
✅ Answer: \(\boxed{a = -0.125, \; b = 2.75, \; c = 25}\)
Thus, \( D(t) = -0.125t^2 + 2.75t + 25 \).
B.
(i)
Average rate of change from \( t=0 \) to \( t=4 \): \[ \frac{D(4)-D(0)}{4-0} = \frac{34 – 25}{4} = \frac{9}{4} = 2.25 \] ✅ Answer: \(\boxed{2.25}\) thousand plays per month.
(ii)
Using the average rate of change, the linear estimate is \( A_t = D(0) + 2.25t = 25 + 2.25t \).
For \( t = 1.5 \): \[ A_{1.5} = 25 + 2.25(1.5) = 25 + 3.375 = 28.375 \] ✅ Answer: \(\boxed{28.375}\) thousand plays.
(iii)
The estimate \( A_t \) is the \( y \)-coordinate of a point on the secant line passing through \( (0, D(0)) \) and \( (4, D(4)) \).
Since \( D(t) \) is a quadratic with \( a = -0.125 < 0 \), its graph is concave down on \( 0 < t < 4 \).
For a concave-down function over an interval, the secant line connecting the endpoints lies below the graph of the function for all \( t \) in the open interval \( (0, 4) \).
Therefore, \( A_t < D(t) \) for all \( t \) where \( 0 < t < 4 \).
✅ Explanation: Concave-down shape places the secant line below the curve.
C.
The quadratic \( D(t) = -0.125t^2 + 2.75t + 25 \) has \( a < 0 \), so it has an absolute maximum (vertex).
Find vertex: \( t = -\frac{b}{2a} = -\frac{2.75}{2(-0.125)} = \frac{2.75}{0.25} = 11 \) months.
In the context, \( D(t) \) models the total number of plays since release, which cannot decrease. However, the quadratic model decreases after \( t = 11 \) (its maximum), which would imply the total plays go down—impossible in reality.
Therefore, the model is only valid up to the time it reaches its maximum. The domain of \( D \) should be restricted to \( t \le 11 \) months (or until the maximum is reached) to ensure the total plays are non-decreasing.
✅ Explanation: The absolute maximum at \( t = 11 \) gives a right endpoint for the domain because the total plays cannot decrease after that time.
Question
Part A
Part B
Part C
▶️ Answer/Explanation
Part A
(i)
Using the data $M(6) = 508.67$ and $M(12) = 517.50$:
$ab^{(6/12)} = 508.67$ (or $ab^{0.5} = 508.67$)
$ab^{(12/12)} = 517.50$ (or $ab = 517.50$)
(ii)
Divide the second equation by the first: $\frac{ab}{ab^{0.5}} = \frac{517.50}{508.67}$
$b^{0.5} \approx 1.017359…$
$b \approx (1.017359…)^2 \approx 1.035019…$
Using $ab = 517.50 \implies a = \frac{517.50}{1.035019…} \approx 500$
Final values: $a \approx 500.00$ and $b \approx 1.035$
Part B
(i)
$t = -2$ falls in the interval $-10 \le t < 0$, so $M(-2) = 500$.
$t = 12$ is given as $M(12) = 517.50$.
Average Rate of Change $= \frac{M(12) – M(-2)}{12 – (-2)}$
$= \frac{517.50 – 500}{12 + 2}$
$= \frac{17.50}{14} = 1.25$ dollars per month.
(ii)
The linear estimate $A(t)$ uses the point $(12, 517.50)$ and slope $1.25$.
$A(20) = M(12) + 1.25(20 – 12)$
$A(20) = 517.50 + 1.25(8)$
$A(20) = 517.50 + 10 = 527.50$ dollars.
(iii)
The model $M(t)$ for $t \ge 0$ is an exponential function ($b > 1$), which is concave up.
The estimate $A(t)$ is a linear function (a secant line).
Since $M(t)$ is increasing at an increasing rate (exponential growth), the linear model will fall further behind the actual values as $t$ increases.
Part C
The model is only valid as long as the account is open.
Setting $M(t) = 565$ allows us to solve for the maximum value of $t$.
$500(1.035)^{(t/12)} = 565$
This value of $t$ serves as the upper bound (maximum) for the domain of the model $M$.
Question
Part A
Part B
Part C
▶️ Answer/Explanation
Part A
(i)
Using the data $M(6) = 508.67$ and $M(12) = 517.50$:
$ab^{(6/12)} = 508.67$ (or $ab^{0.5} = 508.67$)
$ab^{(12/12)} = 517.50$ (or $ab = 517.50$)
(ii)
Divide the second equation by the first: $\frac{ab}{ab^{0.5}} = \frac{517.50}{508.67}$
$b^{0.5} \approx 1.017359…$
$b \approx (1.017359…)^2 \approx 1.035019…$
Using $ab = 517.50 \implies a = \frac{517.50}{1.035019…} \approx 500$
Final values: $a \approx 500.00$ and $b \approx 1.035$
Part B
(i)
$t = -2$ falls in the interval $-10 \le t < 0$, so $M(-2) = 500$.
$t = 12$ is given as $M(12) = 517.50$.
Average Rate of Change $= \frac{M(12) – M(-2)}{12 – (-2)}$
$= \frac{517.50 – 500}{12 + 2}$
$= \frac{17.50}{14} = 1.25$ dollars per month.
(ii)
The linear estimate $A(t)$ uses the point $(12, 517.50)$ and slope $1.25$.
$A(20) = M(12) + 1.25(20 – 12)$
$A(20) = 517.50 + 1.25(8)$
$A(20) = 517.50 + 10 = 527.50$ dollars.
(iii)
The model $M(t)$ for $t \ge 0$ is an exponential function ($b > 1$), which is concave up.
The estimate $A(t)$ is a linear function (a secant line).
Since $M(t)$ is increasing at an increasing rate (exponential growth), the linear model will fall further behind the actual values as $t$ increases.
Part C
The model is only valid as long as the account is open.
Setting $M(t) = 565$ allows us to solve for the maximum value of $t$.
$500(1.035)^{(t/12)} = 565$
This value of $t$ serves as the upper bound (maximum) for the domain of the model $M$.
Question
Part A
Part B
Part C
▶️ Answer/Explanation
Part A
(i)
Using the data $M(6) = 508.67$ and $M(12) = 517.50$:
$ab^{(6/12)} = 508.67$ (or $ab^{0.5} = 508.67$)
$ab^{(12/12)} = 517.50$ (or $ab = 517.50$)
(ii)
Divide the second equation by the first: $\frac{ab}{ab^{0.5}} = \frac{517.50}{508.67}$
$b^{0.5} \approx 1.017359…$
$b \approx (1.017359…)^2 \approx 1.035019…$
Using $ab = 517.50 \implies a = \frac{517.50}{1.035019…} \approx 500$
Final values: $a \approx 500.00$ and $b \approx 1.035$
Part B
(i)
$t = -2$ falls in the interval $-10 \le t < 0$, so $M(-2) = 500$.
$t = 12$ is given as $M(12) = 517.50$.
Average Rate of Change $= \frac{M(12) – M(-2)}{12 – (-2)}$
$= \frac{517.50 – 500}{12 + 2}$
$= \frac{17.50}{14} = 1.25$ dollars per month.
(ii)
The linear estimate $A(t)$ uses the point $(12, 517.50)$ and slope $1.25$.
$A(20) = M(12) + 1.25(20 – 12)$
$A(20) = 517.50 + 1.25(8)$
$A(20) = 517.50 + 10 = 527.50$ dollars.
(iii)
The model $M(t)$ for $t \ge 0$ is an exponential function ($b > 1$), which is concave up.
The estimate $A(t)$ is a linear function (a secant line).
Since $M(t)$ is increasing at an increasing rate (exponential growth), the linear model will fall further behind the actual values as $t$ increases.
Part C
The model is only valid as long as the account is open.
Setting $M(t) = 565$ allows us to solve for the maximum value of $t$.
$500(1.035)^{(t/12)} = 565$
This value of $t$ serves as the upper bound (maximum) for the domain of the model $M$.
Question
(A) (i) Use the given data to write two equations that can be used to find the values for constants \(a\) and \(b\) in the expression for \(R(t)\).
(ii) Find the values for \(a\) and \(b\) as decimal approximations.
(B) (i) Use the given data to find the average rate of change in the number of students that have heard the rumor, in students per hour, from \(t=2\) to \(t=6\) hours. Express your answer as a decimal approximation. Show the computations that lead to your answer.
(ii) Interpret the meaning of your answer from (i) in the context of the problem.
(iii) Consider the values that result from using the average rate of change found in (i) to estimate the number of students that have heard the rumor for times \(t=p\) hours, where \(0 < p < 6\). Are these estimates less than or greater than the number of students predicted by the model \(R\) for times \(t=p\) hours? Explain your reasoning using characteristics of the average rate of change and characteristics of the model \(R\).
▶️ Answer/Explanation
Part (A)
(i) Writing the equations:
We are given the following data points:
• At \(t=2\), \(R(2) = 15\).
• At \(t=6\), \(R(6) = 67\).
For \(t=2\), since \(0 \le 2 < 6\), we use the first part of the piecewise function: \(R(t) = 7(a)^{t/2}\).
$$15 = 7(a)^{2/2} \quad \Rightarrow \quad 15 = 7a^1$$
Equation 1: \(15 = 7a\)
For \(t=6\), since \(t \ge 6\), we use the second part of the piecewise function: \(R(t) = -213.29 + b \ln t\).
Equation 2: \(67 = -213.29 + b \ln(6)\)
(ii) Finding the values for \(a\) and \(b\):
From Equation 1:
$$a = \frac{15}{7} \approx 2.1428$$
From Equation 2:
$$67 + 213.29 = b \ln(6)$$
$$280.29 = b \ln(6)$$
$$b = \frac{280.29}{\ln(6)} \approx \frac{280.29}{1.79176} \approx 156.4328$$
Answer: \(a \approx 2.143\), \(b \approx 156.433\)
Part (B)
(i) Average Rate of Change:
The formula for the average rate of change from \(t=2\) to \(t=6\) is:
$$\text{Avg Rate} = \frac{R(6) – R(2)}{6 – 2}$$
Substituting the given values (\(R(6)=67\) and \(R(2)=15\)):
$$\text{Avg Rate} = \frac{67 – 15}{4} = \frac{52}{4} = 13$$
Answer: 13 students per hour.
(ii) Interpretation:
On average, the number of students who have heard the rumor increases by 13 students per hour between the 2nd hour and the 6th hour.
(iii) Estimates vs. Model Prediction:
Answer: The estimates are greater than the number of students predicted by the model.
Reasoning:
• On the interval \(0 < t < 6\), the function \(R(t) = 7(a)^{t/2}\) is an exponential growth function with a base greater than 1.
• Exponential growth functions are concave up (the rate of change is increasing).
• The average rate of change corresponds to the slope of the secant line connecting the points at \(t=2\) and \(t=6\).
• For a concave up curve, the secant line lies above the curve on the interval between the two points. Therefore, linear estimates based on the average rate (secant line) will be greater than the actual function values.
Part (C)
The range values (outputs) of \(R(t)\) represent the number of students. In the context of the problem, this range must be limited in two ways:
1. Population Cap: The number of students who heard the rumor cannot exceed the total student population of the school.
2. Discrete Values: You cannot have a fraction of a student, so strictly speaking, the context implies the range should consist of whole numbers (non-negative integers).
Question
▶️ Answer/Explanation
(A)(i) Equations
Substituting the points \((1, 3)\) and \((5, 89)\) into \(H(t) = ab^t\):
1. \(3 = ab^1\) (or \(3 = ab\))
2. \(89 = ab^5\)
(A)(ii) Values for a and b
Dividing equation 2 by equation 1: \(\frac{ab^5}{ab} = \frac{89}{3} \implies b^4 = 29.67\).
Solving for \(b\): \(b = (29.67)^{0.25} \approx 2.33\).
Solving for \(a\): \(a = \frac{3}{2.33} \approx 1.29\).
(B)(i) Average Rate of Change
\(\text{Rate} = \frac{H(5) – H(1)}{5 – 1} = \frac{89 – 3}{4} = \frac{86}{4} = 21.5\)
Answer: 21.5 feet per week.
(B)(ii) Interpretation
The answer indicates that between the first and fifth weeks, the bamboo tree grew at an average speed of 21.5 feet per week.
(B)(iii) Comparison
Greater. The function represents exponential growth (\(b > 1\)), which is concave up. This means the rate of growth increases over time, so the rate after week 5 will be steeper than the rate before week 5.
(C) Confidence
\(t = 4\) weeks.
The biologists should be more confident in \(t=4\) because it is an interpolation (within the observed data range). \(t=11\) is an extrapolation; biological growth cannot remain exponential indefinitely, so the model is likely inaccurate that far out.
