Home / AP® Exam / AP® Statistics / 4.9 Combining Random Variables- FRQs

AP Statistics 4.9 Combining Random Variables- FRQs - Exam Style Questions

Question

A company manufactures model rockets that require igniters to launch. Once an igniter is used to launch a rocket, the igniter cannot be reused. Sometimes an igniter fails to operate correctly, and the rocket does not launch. The company estimates that the overall failure rate, defined as the percent of all igniters that fail to operate correctly, is 15 percent.
A company engineer develops a new igniter, called the super igniter, with the intent of lowering the failure rate. To test the performance of the super igniters, the engineer uses the following process.
Step 1: One super igniter is selected at random and used in a rocket.
Step 2: If the rocket launches, another super igniter is selected at random and used in a rocket.
Step 2 is repeated until the process stops. The process stops when a super igniter fails to operate correctly or 32 super igniters have successfully launched rockets, whichever comes first. Assume that super igniter failures are independent.
(a) If the failure rate of the super igniters is 15 percent, what is the probability that the first 30 super igniters selected using the testing process successfully launch rockets?
(b) Given that the first 30 super igniters successfully launch rockets, what is the probability that the first failure occurs on the thirty-first or the thirty-second super igniter tested if the failure rate of the super igniters is 15 percent?
(c) Given that the first 30 super igniters successfully launch rockets, is it reasonable to believe that the failure rate of the super igniters is less than 15 percent? Explain.

Most-appropriate topic codes (CED):

TOPIC 4.6: Independent Events and Unions of Events — parts (a), (b)
TOPIC 4.9: Combining Random Variables — parts (a), (b)
TOPIC 6.3: Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Population Proportion — part (c)
▶️ Answer/Explanation
Detailed solution

(a)
If the failure rate is 15%, then the probability of success for each igniter is \( 1 – 0.15 = 0.85 \).
Since the igniter failures are independent, the probability that all first 30 igniters succeed is:
\( P(\text{30 successes}) = (0.85)^{30} \approx 0.0076 \)
\( \boxed{0.0076} \)

(b)
Given that the first 30 igniters succeeded, we want the probability that the first failure occurs on the 31st or 32nd trial.
This is equivalent to finding the probability of first failure on trial 1 or 2 in a new sequence.
• Probability first failure on trial 31: \( 0.15 \)
• Probability first failure on trial 32: \( (0.85)(0.15) = 0.1275 \)
Total probability: \( 0.15 + 0.1275 = 0.2775 \)
\( \boxed{0.2775} \)

(c)
\( \boxed{\text{Yes}} \), it is reasonable to believe that the failure rate is less than 15%.
The probability of getting 30 consecutive successful launches if the failure rate is 15% is only 0.0076, which is less than 1%. This very small probability suggests that such an outcome would be extremely unlikely if the true failure rate were 15%. Since this probability is smaller than conventional significance levels (such as \( \alpha = 0.05 \) or \( \alpha = 0.01 \)), we have convincing evidence that the super igniters have a lower failure rate than 15%.

Scroll to Top