Home / AP® Exam / AP® Statistics / 6.7 Potential Errors When Performing Tests- FRQs

AP Statistics 6.7 Potential Errors When Performing Tests- FRQs - Exam Style Questions

Question

The manager of a large company that sells pet supplies online wants to increase sales by encouraging repeat purchases. The manager believes that if past customers are offered \(\$10\) off their next purchase, more than \(40\) percent of them will place an order. To investigate the belief, \(90\) customers who placed an order in the past year are selected at random. Each of the selected customers is sent an e-mail with a coupon for \(\$10\) off the next purchase if the order is placed within \(30\) days. Of those who receive the coupon, \(38\) place an order.
(a) Is there convincing statistical evidence, at the significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\), that the manager’s belief is correct? Complete the appropriate inference procedure to support your answer.
(b) Based on your conclusion from part (a), which of the two errors, Type I or Type II, could have been made? Interpret the consequence of the error in context.

Most-appropriate topic codes (CED):

TOPIC 6.4: Setting Up a Test for a Population Proportion
TOPIC 6.6: Concluding a Test for a Population Proportion
TOPIC 6.7: Potential Errors When Performing Tests
▶️ Answer/Explanation
Detailed solution

(a) Inference Procedure

State:
We will perform a one-sample z-test for a population proportion. Let \(p\) be the true proportion of all past customers who would place an order after receiving the coupon. The significance level is \(\alpha=0.05\).
The hypotheses are:
\(H_0: p = 0.40\)
\(H_a: p > 0.40\)


Plan:
We check the conditions for inference.
1. Random: The data come from a random sample of \(90\) customers.
2. Independence (10% condition): It is reasonable to assume the company has more than \(10 \times 90 = 900\) past customers.
3. Normality (Large Counts): We check the condition using the null hypothesis value \(p_0=0.40\).
\(np_0 = 90(0.40) = 36 \ge 10\)
\(n(1-p_0) = 90(0.60) = 54 \ge 10\)
All conditions are met.


Do:
The sample proportion is \(\hat{p} = \frac{38}{90} \approx 0.4222\).
The test statistic is:
\(z = \frac{\hat{p} – p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}} = \frac{0.4222 – 0.40}{\sqrt{\frac{(0.40)(0.60)}{90}}} \approx \frac{0.0222}{0.0516} \approx 0.430\)

The p-value is the area to the right of the test statistic:
p-value = \(P(Z > 0.430) \approx 0.3336\)


Conclude:
Since the p-value (\(0.3336\)) is greater than the significance level (\(\alpha = 0.05\)), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

There is not convincing statistical evidence to support the manager’s belief that more than \(40\) percent of all past customers would place an order after receiving the coupon.


(b) Type of Error

Because we failed to reject the null hypothesis, we could have made a Type II error.

A Type II error in this context would occur if the coupon is actually effective (the true proportion of customers who would place an order is greater than \(0.40\)), but we failed to find convincing evidence of this. The consequence would be a missed opportunity for the company; they would incorrectly conclude the coupon strategy is not effective and might not implement it, thereby losing potential sales.

Scroll to Top