Home / AP® Exam / AP® Statistics / 6.9 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Difference of Population Proportions- FRQs

AP Statistics 6.9 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Difference of Population Proportions- FRQs - Exam Style Questions

Question

A survey organization conducted telephone interviews in December \(2008\) in which \(1,009\) randomly selected adults in the United States responded to the following question.
At the present time, do you think television commercials are an effective way to promote a new product?
Of the \(1,009\) adults surveyed, \(676\) responded “yes.” In December \(2007\), \(622\) of \(1,020\) randomly selected adults in the United States had responded “yes” to the same question. Do the data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of adults in the United States who would respond “yes” to the question changed from December \(2007\) to December \(2008\)?

Most-appropriate topic codes (CED):

TOPIC 6.9: Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Difference of Population Proportions — part (State)
TOPIC 6.10: Setting Up a Test for the Difference of Two Population Proportions — part (Plan)
TOPIC 6.11: Carrying Out a Test for the Difference of Two Population Proportions — part (Do)
TOPIC 6.11: Carrying Out a Test for the Difference of Two Population Proportions — part (Conclude)
▶️ Answer/Explanation
Detailed solution

State:
Let \( p_{07} \) be the population proportion of U.S. adults who would answer “yes” in December \(2007\).
Let \( p_{08} \) be the population proportion of U.S. adults who would answer “yes” in December \(2008\).
\( H_0: p_{07} = p_{08} \)
\( H_a: p_{07} \neq p_{08} \)

Plan:
We will use a two-sample \( z \)-test for proportions.
Conditions:
1. Random: Both samples were randomly selected.
2. Normal: All counts are at least \(10\):
• \(2007\): \(622\) yes, \(1,020 – 622 = 398\) no
• \(2008\): \(676\) yes, \(1,009 – 676 = 333\) no
3. Independent: Population of U.S. adults is much larger than \(10 \times 1,020\) and \(10 \times 1,009\).

Do:
\( \hat{p}_{07} = \frac{622}{1020} \approx 0.6098, \quad \hat{p}_{08} = \frac{676}{1009} \approx 0.6700 \)
\( \hat{p}_c = \frac{622 + 676}{1020 + 1009} = \frac{1298}{2029} \approx 0.6397 \)
\( z = \frac{0.6098 – 0.6700}{\sqrt{0.6397(1-0.6397)\left(\frac{1}{1020} + \frac{1}{1009}\right)}} \approx \frac{-0.0602}{\sqrt{0.2304 \times 0.00197}} \approx \frac{-0.0602}{0.0213} \approx -2.82 \)
\( p \)-value \( = 2 \times P(Z < -2.82) \approx 2 \times 0.0024 = 0.0048 \)

Conclude:
Since the \( p \)-value (\(0.0048\)) is less than \(\alpha = 0.05\), we reject \( H_0 \). There is convincing evidence that the proportion of U.S. adults who would answer “yes” changed from December \(2007\) to December \(2008\).

Scroll to Top