Home / AP® Exam / Pre AP Biology / Exam Style Questions

Pre AP Biology -CELLS 2.3 Specialized Cells- FRQ Exam Style Questions -New Syllabus

Pre AP Biology -CELLS 2.3 Specialized Cells- FRQ Exam Style Questions – New Syllabus 2025-2026

Pre AP Biology -CELLS 2.3 Specialized Cells- FRQ Exam Style Questions – Pre AP Biology – per latest Pre AP Biology Syllabus.

Pre AP Biology – FRQ Exam Style Questions- All Topics

Question

Streptococcus pyogenes is a pathogenic bacterium that can cause a range of diseases including a sore throat. People infected by S. pyogenes produce specific antibodies against the bacterium that normally enable them to recover after several days.
(a) Describe the role of specific antibodies in fighting an S. pyogenes infection and explain how their concentration changes from the time of infection until recovery.
 
A study aimed to test the effectiveness of a new vaccine against S. pyogenes. Participants were divided into two groups ($A$ and $B$) of equal size and put through a three-stage trial, as shown below.
Participants also indicated whether they suffered from a sore throat at any point during the study. The data in the table below shows the results from four participants at the end of the study.

(b) Justify which participant is most likely to have received the placebo injection.

Most-appropriate topic codes (Pre-AP Biology):

TOPIC: CELLS2.3 – Specialized Cells: Multicellular organisms have specialized cells that perform a wide variety of unique functions — part (a)
TOPIC: CELLS4.1 – Organ/Tissue Systems: Multicellular organisms rely on systems to maintain dynamic homeostasis in response to disruptions — part (a)
Area of Focus — Emphasis on Analytical Reading and Writing: Analyze experimental data and translate information from tables to carry out scientific argumentation — part (b)
▶️ Answer/Explanation
Detailed solution

(a) Role of antibodies and concentration changes:

  • Role: Specific antibodies bind to the antigens on the surface of S. pyogenes. This can lead to agglutination (clumping together of bacteria), which prevents them from spreading and makes it easier for phagocytes to locate and engulf them.
  • Opsonization: Antibodies coat the bacteria, serving as markers that enhance engulfment by macrophages and neutrophils (phagocytosis).
  • Neutralization: Antibodies may bind to toxins produced by the bacteria or block the adhesion molecules the bacteria use to attach to host cells, thereby neutralizing the threat.
  • Concentration Change (Timeline):
    • Lag Phase: Immediately after infection, there is a delay (lag phase) where antibody concentration remains low while B cells detect the antigen and undergo clonal expansion.
    • Log Phase: The concentration of antibodies (IgM followed by IgG) increases rapidly as differentiated plasma cells begin mass secretion.
    • Peak & Decline: The concentration reaches a peak as the infection is cleared. Once the bacteria are eliminated, antibody levels decline, though they remain above baseline due to the persistence of memory cells.

(b) Justification for the placebo recipient:

Participant 1 is the most likely to have received the placebo.

  • Stage 2 Evidence (Key Justification): At Stage 2, which occurs $14$ days after the initial injection but before the throat swab with bacteria, Participant 1 has a low memory cell concentration.
  • This indicates that the initial injection did not provoke an immune response or the creation of immunological memory, which is characteristic of a placebo (salt solution) rather than a vaccine. Conversely, Participants 2 and 4 show “high” memory cell concentrations at this stage, indicating a successful response to a vaccine.
  • Symptom Evidence: Participant 1 developed a “sore throat,” indicating that they were susceptible to the infection when exposed to S. pyogenes in Stage 2, which aligns with a lack of prior protection.
  • Stage 3 Response: The increase in memory cells and antibodies to “medium” at Stage 3 represents a primary immune response triggered by the actual infection (the swab) rather than a secondary response to vaccination.
Scroll to Top