Home / AP Statistics 6.9 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Difference of Population Proportions Study Notes

AP Statistics 6.9 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Difference of Population Proportions Study Notes

AP Statistics 6.9 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Difference of Population Proportions Study Notes- New syllabus

AP Statistics 6.9 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Difference of Population Proportions Study Notes -As per latest AP Statistics Syllabus.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

  • An interval of values should be used to estimate parameters, in order to account for uncertainty.

Key Concepts:

  • Justifying Confidence Interval for a Difference Between Two Population Proportions

AP Statistics -Concise Summary Notes- All Topics

Justifying Confidence Interval for a Difference Between Two Population Proportions

Confidence Interval for a Difference Between Two Population Proportions

A confidence interval (CI) for a difference in population proportions provides a range of plausible values for the true difference \( p_1 – p_2 \). It can be used to estimate or justify claims about the populations.

Procedure:

Use a two-sample z-interval for proportions:

\( (\hat{p}_1 – \hat{p}_2) \pm z^* \sqrt{\dfrac{\hat{p}_1 (1 – \hat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \dfrac{\hat{p}_2 (1 – \hat{p}_2)}{n_2}} \)

  • \( \hat{p}_1, \hat{p}_2 \) = sample proportions
  • \( n_1, n_2 \) = sample sizes
  • \( z^* \) = critical value from the standard Normal distribution for the confidence level

 Conditions to Verify:

  • Random samples from independent populations.
  • Independent samples: observations in one sample do not affect the other.
  • Normal approximation: \( n_1 \hat{p}_1 \ge 10, n_1 (1-\hat{p}_1) \ge 10, n_2 \hat{p}_2 \ge 10, n_2 (1-\hat{p}_2) \ge 10 \).

Stepwise Calculation:

  1. Compute the point estimate: \( \hat{p}_1 – \hat{p}_2 \).
  2. Compute the standard error: \( SE = \sqrt{\dfrac{\hat{p}_1 (1-\hat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \dfrac{\hat{p}_2 (1-\hat{p}_2)}{n_2}} \).
  3. Determine the critical value \( z^* \) for the desired confidence level.
  4. Compute the margin of error: \( ME = z^* \cdot SE \).
  5. Construct the confidence interval: \( (\hat{p}_1 – \hat{p}_2) \pm ME \).
  6. Interpret the interval in context, including reference to the samples taken and the populations they represent.

Interpretation Concepts:

  • In repeated random sampling with the same sample sizes, approximately C% of the confidence intervals created will capture the true difference in population proportions \( p_1 – p_2 \).
  • An interpretation of a CI should include:
    • Reference to the specific sample(s) used
    • Details about the populations the sample(s) represent
    • Contextual meaning of the interval (plausible range for the difference)

Example:

A researcher compares the proportion of male and female students who prefer online learning. Sample data:

  • Males: 40 out of 60 prefer online classes (\( \hat{p}_1 = 0.667 \))
  • Females: 50 out of 80 prefer online classes (\( \hat{p}_2 = 0.625 \))

Construct a 95% confidence interval for \( p_1 – p_2 \) and interpret it.

▶️ Answer / Explanation

Step 1: Verify conditions

  • Random samples 
  • Independent samples 
  • Normal approximation: Males: \( n_1 \hat{p}_1 = 40 \), \( n_1 (1-\hat{p}_1) = 20 \); Females: \( n_2 \hat{p}_2 = 50 \), \( n_2 (1-\hat{p}_2) = 30 \) 

Step 2: Point estimate

\( \hat{p}_1 – \hat{p}_2 = 0.667 – 0.625 = 0.042 \)

Step 3: Standard error

\( SE = \sqrt{\dfrac{0.667*0.333}{60} + \dfrac{0.625*0.375}{80}} \approx 0.0814 \)

Step 4: Critical value

95% CI → \( z^* = 1.96 \)

Step 5: Margin of error

\( ME = 1.96 * 0.0814 \approx 0.159 \)

Step 6: Confidence interval

\( (\hat{p}_1 – \hat{p}_2) \pm ME = 0.042 \pm 0.159 \Rightarrow [-0.117, 0.201] \)

Step 7: Interpretation

  • We are 95% confident that the true difference in preference (males – females) lies between -0.117 and 0.201.
  • This interval references the sample data and the populations they represent.
  • Since 0 is in the interval, there is insufficient evidence of a difference in preference between male and female students.
  • In repeated sampling with the same sample sizes, approximately 95% of such confidence intervals would capture the true difference \( p_1 – p_2 \).

Example :

A school wants to compare the proportion of male and female students who prefer online learning. Sample data:

  • Males: 45 out of 75 prefer online classes (\( \hat{p}_1 = 0.6 \))
  • Females: 50 out of 80 prefer online classes (\( \hat{p}_2 = 0.625 \))

 A 95% confidence interval for \( p_1 – p_2 \) is constructed. Which of the following statements is correct?

  1. The interval suggests that male students are significantly more likely to prefer online learning than female students.
  2. The interval suggests that female students are significantly more likely to prefer online learning than male students.
  3. The interval likely contains 0, so there is insufficient evidence of a difference in preference.
  4. The interval can prove which gender prefers online learning.
▶️ Answer / Explanation

Step 1: Point estimate

\( \hat{p}_1 – \hat{p}_2 = 0.6 – 0.625 = -0.025 \)

Step 2: Standard error

\( SE = \sqrt{\dfrac{0.6 * 0.4}{75} + \dfrac{0.625 * 0.375}{80}} \approx \sqrt{0.0032 + 0.00293} \approx 0.077 \)

Step 3: Margin of error

95% CI → \( z^* = 1.96 \), so \( ME = 1.96*0.077 \approx 0.151 \)

Step 4: Confidence interval

\( -0.025 \pm 0.151 \Rightarrow [-0.176, 0.126] \)

Step 5: Interpretation

  • The interval contains 0, so there is insufficient evidence of a difference in preference between male and female students.
  • Conclusion: Option C is correct.
Scroll to Top