Home / IB Mathematics AHL 4.17 Poisson distribution -AI HL Paper 2- Exam Style Questions

IB Mathematics AHL 4.17 Poisson distribution -AI HL Paper 2- Exam Style Questions- New Syllabus

Question

Goran is conducting a study on the number of sightings of a specific bird species observed each week over a period of \(50\) weeks. The frequency distribution of his data is summarized in the table below:
Number of sightings (\(x\))\(0\)\(1\)\(2\)\(3\)\(4\)\(5\)More than \(5\)
Number of weeks (\(f\))\(8\)\(16\)\(13\)\(8\)\(3\)\(2\)\(0\)
The sample mean number of sightings per week for this data set is \(1.76\).
(a) Calculate the unbiased estimate of the population variance, \(s^2\), of sightings per week.
(b) Explain why the result from part (a) supports the hypothesis that the sightings follow a Poisson distribution.
Goran performs a chi-squared goodness-of-fit test at a \(5\%\) significance level. He assumes the null hypothesis \(X \sim \text{Po}(1.76)\). The table below shows his calculated expected frequencies:
Sightings (\(x\))\(0\)\(1\)\(2\)\(3\)\(4\)\(\geq 5\)
Expected Frequency\(8.62\)\(15.17\)\(13.35\)\(7.83\)\(j\)\(k\)
(c) (i) Find the value of \(j\).
  (ii) Find the value of \(k\).
(d) State the requirement that necessitates the combining of groups before conducting the significance test.
(e) Determine the number of degrees of freedom for this test.
(f) Determine the \(p\)-value for the test.
(g) State the conclusion of the test in context, justifying your answer.

Most-appropriate topic codes:

SL 4.3: Measures of dispersion (unbiased estimate of variance) — part (a)
AHL 4.17: Poisson distribution properties (mean = variance) — part (b)
AHL 4.12: \(\chi^2\) goodness-of-fit test and pooling categories — parts (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) 
▶️ Answer/Explanation
Detailed solution

(a)
Total weeks \(n = 50\). Mean \(\mu = 1.76\).
\(s^2 = \frac{\sum f(x – \bar{x})^2}{n – 1} = \frac{83.12}{49} \approx 1.69632\).
Unbiased variance estimate = \(1.70\) (3 s.f.).

(b)
In a Poisson distribution, the mean and variance are equal. Here, the mean (\(1.76\)) and unbiased variance (\(1.70\)) are very similar, suggesting the model is appropriate.

(c)
(i) \(P(X=4) = \frac{e^{-1.76} \times 1.76^4}{4!} \approx 0.06879\). Expected \(j = 50 \times 0.06879 = \mathbf{3.44}\).
(ii) \(P(X \geq 5) = 1 – P(X \leq 4) \approx 0.0319\). Expected \(k = 50 \times 0.0319 = \mathbf{1.68}\).

(d)
The test requires that all expected frequencies are at least \(5\)[cite: 1415]. Since \(j < 5\) and \(k < 5\), these categories must be combined.

(e)
Degrees of freedom \(df = (\text{number of cells}) – 1 – (\text{parameters estimated})\).
Cells after combining (\(0, 1, 2, 3, \geq 4\)) \(= 5\). Estimated \(\lambda = 1\).
\(df = 5 – 1 – 1 = \mathbf{3}\).

(f)
Using technology with combined observed values \(\{8, 16, 13, 8, 5\}\) and expected values \(\{8.62, 15.17, 13.35, 7.83, 5.03\}\):
\(p\)-value \(\approx 0.991\).

(g)
Since \(0.991 > 0.05\), do not reject the null hypothesis. There is insufficient evidence to suggest the data does not follow a Poisson distribution.

Markscheme:

(a) 1.70 (1.69632)

(b) variance and mean are similar

(c)(i) j = 3.44 (ii) k = 1.68

(d) expected frequencies less than 5

(e) 3

(f) 0.991

(g) 99% > 5%, insufficient evidence to reject H₀

Scroll to Top