IBDP Economics HL – The global economy – Types of trade protection trade -Paper 2 Exam Style Practice Questions
Types of trade protection Paper 2?
Exam Style Questions..
Subject Guide IBDP Economic IBO
IBDP Economic HL- All Topics
Exam Style Question for IBDP Economics HL- Types of trade protection -Paper 2
Canadian drywall tariffs will continue
- Recently imposed Canadian tariffs on drywall imports have pushed up the cost of building a new home by thousands of Canadian dollars (CA\($\)) in the last four months. Drywall is a pre-made wall section that is used in the construction industry for building houses. Doubt as to whether the tariffs will remain is causing uncertainty for building firms, drywall manufacturers and homeowners.
- For now, higher prices will continue following a ruling by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) this week. The tribunal found that United States (US) firms had been dumping drywall products into Western Canada over the past few years, harming the Canadian drywall industry.
- The ruling will end preliminary tariffs of up to 276 % imposed by Canada on imports of drywall from the US. However, they will be replaced by permanent, variable tariffs that would be imposed on imported drywall products whose prices fall below the minimum prices determined by the CITT.
- “The preliminary tariff was very damaging to homebuilding,” said a building industry spokesperson. “Not just homebuilding, but hospitals, commercial buildings, indeed any new construction,” he said. “It’s a cost that someone had to pay for. It lowered the profits of house builders.” It has been estimated that the immediate sharp increase in variable costs, following the imposition of the preliminary tariff, resulted in an extra CA\($\)3000 to CA\($\)5000 on the cost of building some homes.
- The preliminary tariffs were imposed after a dumping complaint by CertainTeed Gypsum Canada (CTGC), the last drywall manufacturer in Western Canada. CTGC has three major production sites and two gypsum quarries. Gypsum is a main component of drywall.
- A CTGC spokesperson had said previously that its plants and quarries could be closed, at the cost of 200 jobs, if the dumping of US drywall products continued. However, since the preliminary tariffs were imposed, the firm has announced that it has hired 30 new employees.
- In a separate report, the CITT found that the preliminary tariffs had been “substantially reducing competition” in Western Canada, to the detriment of Canada’s homebuilders. In response, supporters of the tariff have suggested that revenue from the tariffs may be used to help areas that lost large numbers of homes and other structures in devastating forest fires.
Question
Using a tariff diagram, explain the effect of the “preliminary tariffs” on Canadian consumers of drywall (paragraph [3]).
▶️Answer/Explanation
- tariff raises prices/costs of production for consumers of drywall
- decrease in quantity demanded
- decrease choice for consumers
- decrease quality due to inefficient domestic producers
- decrease consumer surplus.
Canadian drywall tariffs will continue
- Recently imposed Canadian tariffs on drywall imports have pushed up the cost of building a new home by thousands of Canadian dollars (CA\($\)) in the last four months. Drywall is a pre-made wall section that is used in the construction industry for building houses. Doubt as to whether the tariffs will remain is causing uncertainty for building firms, drywall manufacturers and homeowners.
- For now, higher prices will continue following a ruling by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) this week. The tribunal found that United States (US) firms had been dumping drywall products into Western Canada over the past few years, harming the Canadian drywall industry.
- The ruling will end preliminary tariffs of up to 276 % imposed by Canada on imports of drywall from the US. However, they will be replaced by permanent, variable tariffs that would be imposed on imported drywall products whose prices fall below the minimum prices determined by the CITT.
- “The preliminary tariff was very damaging to homebuilding,” said a building industry spokesperson. “Not just homebuilding, but hospitals, commercial buildings, indeed any new construction,” he said. “It’s a cost that someone had to pay for. It lowered the profits of house builders.” It has been estimated that the immediate sharp increase in variable costs, following the imposition of the preliminary tariff, resulted in an extra CA\($\)3000 to CA\($\)5000 on the cost of building some homes.
- The preliminary tariffs were imposed after a dumping complaint by CertainTeed Gypsum Canada (CTGC), the last drywall manufacturer in Western Canada. CTGC has three major production sites and two gypsum quarries. Gypsum is a main component of drywall.
- A CTGC spokesperson had said previously that its plants and quarries could be closed, at the cost of 200 jobs, if the dumping of US drywall products continued. However, since the preliminary tariffs were imposed, the firm has announced that it has hired 30 new employees.
- In a separate report, the CITT found that the preliminary tariffs had been “substantially reducing competition” in Western Canada, to the detriment of Canada’s homebuilders. In response, supporters of the tariff have suggested that revenue from the tariffs may be used to help areas that lost large numbers of homes and other structures in devastating forest fires.
Question
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the effect of the tariff on drywall on different stakeholders.
▶️Answer/Explanation
Responses may include:
- definition of stakeholders
- definition of tariff.
Consumers of drywall (Canadian building firms):
- will face higher costs, and thus reduced profits (paragraph [4])
- fall in the production of buildings (paragraph [4])
- may cause unemployment.
Domestic producers of drywall:
- will receive higher prices (paragraph [3]) and thus more profits
- increase in output and sales
- increase in employment (paragraph [6])
- supporting monopoly power (paragraph [5]).
US producers of drywall:
- higher costs
- reduced sales
- lower profits and possibly a decrease in employment.
The Canadian government:
- increased revenue (paragraph [7])
- possible retaliation from the US.
Canadian economy:
- reduction in competition (paragraph [7]), leading to inefficiency
- inflationary pressure in the housing market (paragraph [4]).
The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific
Partnership (CPTPP), Australia and Japan
- In 2018, Australia signed the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)*. The agreement creates the third largest free trade area in the world, covers nearly 500 million people and is worth more than US\($\)12 trillion. The members of the agreement have stated that economic integration and free trade is important to help foster good political relations and inclusive growth for all nations.
- The trade agreement will aim to gradually eliminate most trade protection within the member countries. The agreement will see tariffs eliminated for Australian cheese and beef exports to Japan, and increased quotas for the export of rice to Japan from 4400 to 8400 tonnes. Nikkei Asian Review reported that “Fast-food restaurants in particular are embracing the import as a way to cut costs to cope with rising wages.” Additionally, Japanese food manufacturers will be able to lower production costs for rice-based meals and benefit from increased stability of input prices. The benefits from the agreement for Japan’s economy are projected to exceed US\($\)70 billion, but some industries would be negatively affected.
- Japanese farmers are worried about the increase in imported food from Australia. Furthermore, the Japanese government is concerned about the effects of the CPTPP on Japan’s food self-sufficiency—Japan relies on other countries for over 60 % of its food. In response to these concerns the Japanese government has offered support for domestic farmers to diversify production into other crops. The government also plans to subsidize the rice farmers through the initial phase of lowering trade barriers.
- The agreement is said to be worth more than US\($\)37 billion to Australian agricultural exports. It is hoped that CPTPP and the falling value of the Australian dollar will help Australia to reduce its current account deficit, but some economists have argued that this can take a long time. According to some estimations, the short-run price elasticity of demand (PED) for Australian exports is 0.2 and the short-run PED for imports in Australia is 0.4. However, the long-run PED for Australian exports is 1.1 and the long-run PED for imports in Australia is 1.3.
- There have also been concerns about the CPTPP from trade unions in Australia. They argue that it deregulates the labour markets and gives corporations from other countries an ability to take legal action against governments for implementing laws that raise wages or protect the environment, if the foreign corporation can prove that the law hurt their commercial interests. One university lecturer said that the future costs to the taxpayer could be significant if foreign companies take the Australian government to court.
- The trade agreement would allow workers from other countries to work in Australia without employers being required to check if Australian citizens are available to fill the jobs before the migrant workers are employed. It is estimated this may risk 39 000 jobs in Australia. Furthermore, environmental activists have expressed concerns that the negative environmental and social effects of the agreement have not been well considered. This may lead to conflicts with Australia’s commitment to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.
Question
Define the term quotas indicated in bold in the text (paragraph [2]).
▶️Answer/Explanation
The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific
Partnership (CPTPP), Australia and Japan
- In 2018, Australia signed the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)*. The agreement creates the third largest free trade area in the world, covers nearly 500 million people and is worth more than US\($\)12 trillion. The members of the agreement have stated that economic integration and free trade is important to help foster good political relations and inclusive growth for all nations.
- The trade agreement will aim to gradually eliminate most trade protection within the member countries. The agreement will see tariffs eliminated for Australian cheese and beef exports to Japan, and increased quotas for the export of rice to Japan from 4400 to 8400 tonnes. Nikkei Asian Review reported that “Fast-food restaurants in particular are embracing the import as a way to cut costs to cope with rising wages.” Additionally, Japanese food manufacturers will be able to lower production costs for rice-based meals and benefit from increased stability of input prices. The benefits from the agreement for Japan’s economy are projected to exceed US\($\)70 billion, but some industries would be negatively affected.
- Japanese farmers are worried about the increase in imported food from Australia. Furthermore, the Japanese government is concerned about the effects of the CPTPP on Japan’s food self-sufficiency—Japan relies on other countries for over 60 % of its food. In response to these concerns the Japanese government has offered support for domestic farmers to diversify production into other crops. The government also plans to subsidize the rice farmers through the initial phase of lowering trade barriers.
- The agreement is said to be worth more than US\($\)37 billion to Australian agricultural exports. It is hoped that CPTPP and the falling value of the Australian dollar will help Australia to reduce its current account deficit, but some economists have argued that this can take a long time. According to some estimations, the short-run price elasticity of demand (PED) for Australian exports is 0.2 and the short-run PED for imports in Australia is 0.4. However, the long-run PED for Australian exports is 1.1 and the long-run PED for imports in Australia is 1.3.
- There have also been concerns about the CPTPP from trade unions in Australia. They argue that it deregulates the labour markets and gives corporations from other countries an ability to take legal action against governments for implementing laws that raise wages or protect the environment, if the foreign corporation can prove that the law hurt their commercial interests. One university lecturer said that the future costs to the taxpayer could be significant if foreign companies take the Australian government to court.
- The trade agreement would allow workers from other countries to work in Australia without employers being required to check if Australian citizens are available to fill the jobs before the migrant workers are employed. It is estimated this may risk 39 000 jobs in Australia. Furthermore, environmental activists have expressed concerns that the negative environmental and social effects of the agreement have not been well considered. This may lead to conflicts with Australia’s commitment to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.
Question
Using an international trade diagram, explain how “increased quotas for the export of rice to Japan” will affect the price of rice in Japan (paragraph [2]).
▶️Answer/Explanation
An international trade diagram showing an increased quota and the resulting decrease in price of rice in Japan.
AND
Explaining that an increase in the quota will mean an increase in imports, shifting (domestic+quota) supply to the right/increasing (domestic+quota) supply, leading to a decrease in the price of rice in Japan.
Filipino rice farmers prepare for trade liberalization
- To meet its obligations under World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, the president of the Philippines has asked the government to eliminate the current quota system for rice imports. As an important part of food security measures, the government wants to achieve self-sufficiency in the production of rice. To support this goal, the WTO allowed the Philippines to extend its rice quota until June 2017 to allow more time for local farmers to prepare for free trade.
- The current quota system for rice imports makes domestic prices rise dramatically during periods of low domestic supply.
- Eliminating the quota on rice aims to make the rice market more competitive, which could reduce the price of rice by as much as 7 Philippine pesos (PH₱) per kilogram (kg). The National Economic and Development Authority has estimated that lower rice prices could save Filipino households as much as PH₱2362 per year. However, if the rice quota is eliminated, economists have warned that the government must prepare local rice producers so that they can either compete with rice imports or move to producing other crops. “Currently Filipino farmers cannot compete with Vietnamese farmers who may enjoy economies of scale” declared one economist. “The solution is to bring down the cost of production of rice.”
- To help Filipino farmers to adjust to competition from lower-priced rice imports, the government has allocated funds to the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund. This fund will provide support to farmers in order to increase productivity by supplying high-yield seeds and fertilizer. It will also provide subsidies to encourage the use of agricultural machinery and will offer support services and training to farmers.
- Apart from being an essential food for many Filipinos, rice is also an important input for the food industry. The plan to remove the import quota will reduce the inflation rate in the Philippines by up to 0.4 %. In July 2018, the central bank governor reported that inflation had reached 5.7 %, well above the government’s target range of 2 % to 4 %. He stated that “supply-side factors are the main drivers of the present inflation. These factors include rising international oil prices, higher indirect taxes and poor weather conditions that have affected food supply”. The president stated that the removal of the rice quota was one solution to ease the rising inflation.
Question
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the impact on the economy in the Philippines of removing the rice quota.
▶️Answer/Explanation
Economic Analysis may include:
- trade protection
- theory of comparative advantage / allocation of resources
- AD /AS
- employment
- inflation
- standard of living
- economies of scale.
Positive impacts may include:
- attempts at self-sufficiency of production improved by eliminating quotas (paragraph [1]) and providing assistance to farmers (paragraph [4])
- rice is a staple food so less volatility in rice prices when quota removed – helps households (paragraph [2])
- lowers rice price for households – significant annual savings (paragraph [3])
- lower rice price has forward linkage effect reducing input costs for food manufacturers (paragraph [5])
- more competition from Vietnamese rice imports encourages domestic producer efficiency and innovation (paragraph [3])
- more efficient allocation of resources if farmers “move to producing other crops” – comparative advantage (paragraph [3])
- opportunity to achieve economies of scale in the long run by bringing “down the cost of production” (technical economies through mechanization and possibility of farm consolidations) (paragraph [3])
- lower rice prices reduce input costs and increase SRAS therefore relieving cost-push inflation (paragraph [5]).
Negative impacts may include:
- goal of self-sufficiency in rice could be compromised in the long run if the number of rice farmers is reduced (paragraph [1])
- rice is a staple food so maintaining rice production is a matter of national security (paragraph [1])
- rice farmers are already making a loss so removing quotas will increase losses and cause some farmers to leave the rice market in the long run (Table 1)
- likely to be unemployment in the sector as rice farmers leave the market (paragraph [3] and Table 1)
- local unemployment can lead to hollowing out of rural communities as unemployed migrate to urban areas
- government revenue allocated to support programs to help rice farmers adjust carries significant opportunity costs (paragraph [4])
- ATC in the Philippines is almost double that in Vietnam, so it might take a long time for Filipino farmers to become competitive (Table 1).
Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Indonesia
- The European Union (EU) and Indonesia are currently negotiating a free trade agreement (FTA). The agreement will aim to increase trade, avoid trade protection and expand foreign direct investment (FDI). Indonesia has the largest economy and population in Southeast Asia. The EU is Indonesia’s third-largest trading partner.
- The FTA could see the clothing and footwear industry in Indonesia increase by over 10 %. However, the labour-intensive manufacturing industry has historically been known for poor working conditions and low wages. On the other hand, increased output could decrease the high unemployment in Indonesia (currently at 12 %). The EU expects its car industry to benefit from the FTA. The agreement would encourage the EU to specialize in cars, and Indonesia to specialize in clothing, therefore both countries could benefit from comparative advantage.
- Since Indonesia’s main competitors already have trade agreements with the EU, establishing an FTA is a priority for the Indonesian government. The EU has a potential market of 510 million consumers, and may offer areas for growth during a time of lower global trade and uncertainty due to the trade war between the United States and China.
- However, recent trade issues between the EU and Indonesia have slowed down negotiations. The EU announced that palm oil biodiesel is unsustainable and will phase these fuels out by 2030. Experts say that palm oil causes excessive deforestation and contributes to climate change. Indonesia is the world’s largest exporter of palm oil.
- The EU has imposed tariffs on biodiesel exports from Indonesia, which may result in Indonesia losing a market worth over US\($\)450 million. Palm oil represents 12 % of Indonesia’s total exports, contributes approximately 2.6 % to gross domestic product (GDP), and the industry employs more than 15 million people. The EU is Indonesia’s largest palm oil customer. Additionally, some EU manufacturing businesses are unhappy with the tariffs as they rely on palm oil to produce their products, such as processed foods.
- In response, Indonesia filed a lawsuit with the World Trade Organization (WTO), stating that the EU’s policy on biodiesel is unfair and is damaging the international image of palm oil. Indonesia claims it is committed to sustainable production practices and to protecting its forests.
- To make up for losing the EU’s market, Indonesia is actively exploring other markets to boost its exports of palm oil. Other countries like China, India and Russia have a more relaxed policy on palm oil and have growing demand for it. Indonesia has also retaliated to the tariff through an investigation into whether EU dairy products exported to Indonesia benefited from subsidies, and has recommended a 20 %–25 % tariff on EU dairy products.
- However, the EU has tried to lower tensions by offering a US\($\)17 million grant to improve trade conditions and capacity in preparation for the FTA. Experts have said that the FTA could support the development of legal and sustainable palm oil production through supporting good governance and capacity building. Indonesia has stated it would welcome help to decrease any market failure caused by palm oil.
Question
Define the term tariffs indicated in bold in the text (paragraph [5]).
▶️Answer/Explanation
Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Indonesia
- The European Union (EU) and Indonesia are currently negotiating a free trade agreement (FTA). The agreement will aim to increase trade, avoid trade protection and expand foreign direct investment (FDI). Indonesia has the largest economy and population in Southeast Asia. The EU is Indonesia’s third-largest trading partner.
- The FTA could see the clothing and footwear industry in Indonesia increase by over 10 %. However, the labour-intensive manufacturing industry has historically been known for poor working conditions and low wages. On the other hand, increased output could decrease the high unemployment in Indonesia (currently at 12 %). The EU expects its car industry to benefit from the FTA. The agreement would encourage the EU to specialize in cars, and Indonesia to specialize in clothing, therefore both countries could benefit from comparative advantage.
- Since Indonesia’s main competitors already have trade agreements with the EU, establishing an FTA is a priority for the Indonesian government. The EU has a potential market of 510 million consumers, and may offer areas for growth during a time of lower global trade and uncertainty due to the trade war between the United States and China.
- However, recent trade issues between the EU and Indonesia have slowed down negotiations. The EU announced that palm oil biodiesel is unsustainable and will phase these fuels out by 2030. Experts say that palm oil causes excessive deforestation and contributes to climate change. Indonesia is the world’s largest exporter of palm oil.
- The EU has imposed tariffs on biodiesel exports from Indonesia, which may result in Indonesia losing a market worth over US\($\)450 million. Palm oil represents 12 % of Indonesia’s total exports, contributes approximately 2.6 % to gross domestic product (GDP), and the industry employs more than 15 million people. The EU is Indonesia’s largest palm oil customer. Additionally, some EU manufacturing businesses are unhappy with the tariffs as they rely on palm oil to produce their products, such as processed foods.
- In response, Indonesia filed a lawsuit with the World Trade Organization (WTO), stating that the EU’s policy on biodiesel is unfair and is damaging the international image of palm oil. Indonesia claims it is committed to sustainable production practices and to protecting its forests.
- To make up for losing the EU’s market, Indonesia is actively exploring other markets to boost its exports of palm oil. Other countries like China, India and Russia have a more relaxed policy on palm oil and have growing demand for it. Indonesia has also retaliated to the tariff through an investigation into whether EU dairy products exported to Indonesia benefited from subsidies, and has recommended a 20 %–25 % tariff on EU dairy products.
- However, the EU has tried to lower tensions by offering a US\($\)17 million grant to improve trade conditions and capacity in preparation for the FTA. Experts have said that the FTA could support the development of legal and sustainable palm oil production through supporting good governance and capacity building. Indonesia has stated it would welcome help to decrease any market failure caused by palm oil.
Question
Using a demand and supply diagram for processed food, explain how the EU’s tariff on palm oil might impact the market for processed food in the EU (paragraph [5]).
▶️Answer/Explanation
For drawing a correctly labelled demand and supply diagram for processed food that shows a decrease in supply (shift the left), and an increase in equilibrium price and decrease in equilibrium quantity.
AND
For explaining that palm oil is a factor of production/input, therefore costs of production (of processed food) will increase. This leads to (a decrease in supply), therefore equilibrium price will increase, and equilibrium quantity will decrease.
Text A — Overview of Tanzania
- Tanzania is one of Africa’s fastest growing economies with an average of 7% annual economic growth since 2000. It is a politically stable country, rich in wildlife and natural resources. However, the growth has been concentrated in urban manufacturing, using capital intensive production. The benefits from this growth have not reached all people and significant inequalities exist between urban and rural areas. Although the relative poverty rate has fallen over the last 15 years, the number of people living in absolute poverty has increased.
- Most people are employed in the slow-growing agricultural sector that relies on unskilled labour. Although incomes increased from 2008 to 2018, the demand for agricultural goods only increased by 21% during this time period. Over 70% of Tanzania’s population lives in rural areas, relying on subsistence farming with limited tradable crops. Only 30% of land is being used for agricultural production. With investment, the remaining unused land could be developed and generate income for farmers.
- The rural sector struggles to meet Tanzania’s food requirements due to low levels of skilled labour and productivity. Additionally, high youth unemployment leads to large numbers of unskilled rural youth migrating to the cities, often finding employment in the informal sector where wages and working conditions are poor. Insufficient investment and lack of government support for diversifying the agriculture sector have been blamed for the persistent inequalities and poverty.
- Tanzania’s cities have experienced a growing middle class with strong purchasing power and political influence who have placed demands on the government for cheaper electricity, better infrastructure, and more imported goods. In response, the government provided subsidies for electricity in city centres and tax benefits to foreign companies operating in Tanzania. There is concern that these measures may worsen inequality and lead to social unrest.
- The growth of Tanzania’s manufacturing and service sector was funded through aid and large government borrowing, resulting in high national debt. Most of the government borrowing was from foreign sources and in US dollars (US$), which is a concern due to a recent depreciation of the Tanzanian shilling (Tanzania’s currency) against the US$. Some of the debt was borrowed domestically and placed upward pressure on interest rates. Higher interest rates have resulted in crowding out but helped keep inflation under control.
Text B — Strategies and opportunities for Tanzania
- Previous governments have used interventionist supply-side policies to improve access to water, education, and health services. However, the health service improvements are not keeping up with population growth and many young people are still not completing secondary school. Infrastructure has improved, but it is still insufficient as producers in the rural sector find it difficult to reach markets and access supplies.
- Aid organizations are currently supporting new sustainable businesses in rural areas through training programmes, especially for women and young people, who make up most of the unemployed in rural areas. Economists have advised the government to improve access to credit through microfinance organizations and to simplify regulations to make it easier to start new businesses.
- The government is establishing property rights in rural areas to provide security for farmers. Historically, farmers could easily lose their land, which reduced their incentive to invest in productive farming methods. The government wants to develop Tanzania’s land resources and lower its reliance on imported food. To reduce food imports, a subsidy will be granted to dairy farmers to allow them to compete against imported dairy products.
- Tanzania is a member of the East African Community (EAC) customs union and common market. However, Tanzania needs to improve human capital and encourage diversification so that the benefits of regional integration can reach the poor. These policies can also help attract foreign direct investment (FDI). Opportunities for growth through trade will expand as the EAC works towards becoming a monetary union in 2024.
Text C — Oil pipeline to be constructed
Tanzania and Uganda plan to construct a major oil pipeline from Uganda through Tanzania, ending at a port in Tanzania. This will attract FDI which could help fund infrastructure and generate jobs. However, environmentalists are concerned about potential ecological damage due to the waste created during the construction of the pipeline. Economists have suggested the waste could be avoided through a circular economy approach in the planning and construction stage.
Question
Using an international trade diagram, explain how a subsidy could help Tanzanian dairy farmers compete against imported dairy products (Text B, paragraph [3]).
▶️Answer/Explanation
For an explanation that a subsidy lowers costs of production for Tanzanian farmers [1], increasing the amount supplied by the domestic producers (allowing domestic producers to compete with imports) [1].