Home / IB DP / IB DP Biology 2026, 2027 & 2028 / IB DP Biology Mock Exam HL Paper 1B Set 2

IB DP Biology Mock Exam HL Paper 1B Set 2- 2025 Syllabus

IB DP Biology Mock Exam HL Paper 1B Set 2

Prepare for the IB DP Biology Exam with our comprehensive IB DP Biology Exam Mock Exam HL Paper 1B Set 2. Test your knowledge and understanding of key concepts with challenging questions covering all essential topics. Identify areas for improvement and boost your confidence for the real exam

IB DP Biology Mock Tests -All Sets

Question 

Male and female human skeletons from several archaeological locations in Greece were examined to identify long-term trends in human height across Europe. The box-and-whisker plot below compares skeleton heights from two historical periods: the Neolithic era (6500–3000 BC) and the Roman era (146–324 AD).
(a) Using the graph,
(i) estimate the median height of Roman-period females. [1]
(ii) estimate the maximum height of Neolithic males. [1]
(iii) suggest a reason why some values appear outside the whiskers of the box-and-whisker plots. [1]
(b) Using the data, discuss whether the variation in human height is consistent with polygenic inheritance. [2]
(c) Phenotypic variation enables natural selection to act on populations. Compare and contrast directional and disruptive selection. [2]
(d) Discuss how the Hardy–Weinberg equation is used in population-genetics research. [3]

▶️ Answer/Explanation

(a)(i)
Estimated median height of Roman-period females is approximately 157 cm.
(Accept values between 156–158 cm.)

(a)(ii)
Maximum height of Neolithic males is around 168 cm.
(Accept values 167–169 cm.)

(a)(iii)
Points outside the whiskers are outliers. These values lie more than 1.5× the interquartile range above the upper quartile.

(b)
Evidence supporting polygenic inheritance:
• Height shows a wide continuous range, not discrete categories.
• Continuous variation is typical of traits controlled by several genes.

Additional consideration:
• Height is also influenced by environmental factors such as diet and health, so the pattern is partially consistent with polygenic inheritance.

(c)
Similarities • Both cause changes in allele frequencies in populations. • Both occur due to environmental pressures acting on phenotypes.

Differences

Directional selectionDisruptive selection
Favours one extremeFavours both extremes
Mean phenotype shiftsMean phenotype is selected against

(d)
Key points about the Hardy–Weinberg equation:
• The equation \( p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1 \) models genotype frequencies when \( p \) and \( q \) represent allele frequencies.
• Applies to genes with one dominant and one recessive allele.
• Used to predict allele and genotype frequencies in populations.
• Predictions are valid only if allele frequencies remain constant (no evolution).
• Assumes: – a large population, – random mating, – no mutation, migration, or genetic drift, – no natural selection.

Researchers use the equation to determine whether a population is in genetic equilibrium or evolving.

Scroll to Top