Home / IB DP / Chemistry / IB DP Chemistry Mock Exam SL Paper 1B Set 1

IB DP Chemistry Mock Exam SL Paper 1B Set 1 - 2025 Syllabus

IB DP Chemistry Mock Exam SL Paper 1B Set 1

Prepare for the IB DP Chemistry Exam with our comprehensive IB DP Chemistry Exam Mock Exam SL Paper 1B Set 1. Test your knowledge and understanding of key concepts with challenging questions covering all essential topics. Identify areas for improvement and boost your confidence for the real exam

IB DP Chemistry Mock Tests -All Sets

Question 

The concentration of calcium ions, \(\text{Ca}^{2+}\), in aqueous solution can be determined either by titration with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
(a) Before use, the EDTA solution must be standardized by titrating it with a standard solution of calcium chloride. An accurately weighed sample of powdered calcium carbonate was dissolved in concentrated hydrochloric acid and heated to expel all \(\text{CO}_{2}\). After cooling, the resulting calcium chloride solution was made up to exactly \(250.0\ \text{cm}^{3}\).
(i) State the most suitable item of glassware used to prepare exactly \(250.0\ \text{cm}^{3}\) of a \(\text{Ca}^{2+}\) solution.
(ii) Describe the steps required to obtain a standard solution by diluting the initial calcium chloride solution.
(b) Solid calcium chloride is not used directly to prepare the standard solution because it readily absorbs water from the air. Suggest how a sample of solid \(\text{CaCl}_{2}\) could be treated in the laboratory to remove all of the absorbed water.
(c) A sample of tap water was titrated with the standardized EDTA solution, using Eriochrome Black T as the indicator. The following burette readings were obtained.
 Trial \(1\)Trial \(2\)Trial \(3\)Trial \(4\)
Final burette reading / \(\text{cm}^{3} \pm 0.05\ \text{cm}^{3}\)\(26.15\)\(34.25\)\(29.30\)\(32.20\)
Initial burette reading / \(\text{cm}^{3} \pm 0.05\ \text{cm}^{3}\)\(0.00\)\(10.00\)\(5.00\)\(8.00\)
Volume of EDTA added / \(\text{cm}^{3}\)\(26.15\)\(24.25\)\(24.30\)\(24.20\)
(i) Suggest two reasons why the volume used in trial \(1\) is much larger than in the other trials.
(ii) Give the name used for a value that differs greatly from the rest of the data.
(iii) Suggest why the result from trial \(1\) should not be included when calculating the mean volume of EDTA used.
(iv) Calculate the percentage uncertainty in the volume of EDTA used in trial \(2\).
(v) At the end-point, a red complex \(X\) changes to a blue ion \(Y\). Explain how this colour change shows that \(X\) absorbs radiation of higher energy than \(Y\).
(d) A standard stock solution of calcium chloride was diluted to prepare several solutions with accurately known concentrations. Their absorbances were measured in a spectrophotometer that had been calibrated with distilled water.
(i) On the provided grid of absorbance versus concentration of \(\text{Ca}^{2+}\) (in \(\text{ppm}\)), draw a suitable line of best fit through the points.
(ii) Using the calibration graph, determine the concentration, in \(\text{ppm}\), of \(\text{Ca}^{2+}\) ions in a sample of tap water that gives an absorbance of \(0.090\).
(iii) The absorbance \(A\) is related to the incident intensity \(I_{0}\) and the transmitted intensity \(I\) by \[ A = \log_{10}\!\left(\dfrac{I_{0}}{I}\right). \] Find the percentage of the incident radiation that is absorbed by a sample of tap water with an absorbance of \(0.090\).
(iv) A solution with concentration \(4.00\ \text{ppm}\) was made by diluting \(2.00\ \text{cm}^{3}\) of the stock solution to \(25.00\ \text{cm}^{3}\). Calculate the concentration, in \(\text{ppm}\), of the stock solution.
(v) Calculate the concentration, in \(\text{mol dm}^{-3}\), of \(\text{Ca}^{2+}\) in the \(4.00\ \text{ppm}\) solution. Assume \(1\ \text{ppm} = 1\ \text{mg dm}^{-3}\).

▶️ Answer/Explanation

(a)(i)
The appropriate glassware is a \(250.0\ \text{cm}^{3}\) volumetric flask.

(a)(ii)
One acceptable procedure (any two key steps):
• Use a funnel to transfer the prepared calcium chloride solution quantitatively into a \(250.0\ \text{cm}^{3}\) volumetric flask, avoiding loss of solution.
• Rinse the beaker and funnel with deionized water and add these washings to the flask.
• Add deionized/distilled water until the bottom of the meniscus touches the calibration mark.
• Stopper the flask and invert it several times to mix and homogenize the solution thoroughly.

(b)
Heat the solid \(\text{CaCl}_{2}\) to constant mass to drive off all water, then allow it to cool in a desiccator or under vacuum so that it does not re-absorb moisture.

(c)(i)
Any two valid reasons, for example:
• The initial titration was performed quickly as a rough titration to get an approximate volume, so extra EDTA was added past the end-point.
• Liquid was not filling the burette tip at the start of trial \(1\), so the recorded initial reading of \(0.00\ \text{cm}^{3}\) did not reflect the true volume delivered.
• The burette tap was leaking or the burette/conical flask was contaminated or not rinsed correctly, requiring more EDTA.
• Extra titrant was deliberately added to confirm that the colour change was complete.

(c)(ii)
A value that differs markedly from the others is called an outlier (or anomalous result / rogue value).

(c)(iii)
Trial \(1\) is an outlier and is not concordant with the other three titres. Including it would give a mean volume (and therefore a calculated concentration) that is too high and introduce systematic error.

(c)(iv)
Burette reading uncertainty is \(\pm 0.05\ \text{cm}^{3}\) for each reading, so the volume delivered has total uncertainty \(\pm 0.10\ \text{cm}^{3}\).
Trial \(2\) volume: \(24.25\ \text{cm}^{3}\).
\[ \%\ \text{uncertainty} = \dfrac{0.10}{24.25} \times 100 \approx 0.41\ \%. \]
\(\boxed{0.4\ \% \text{ (to two significant figures)}}\)

(c)(v)
• The red complex \(X\) appears red because it absorbs green light (its complementary colour, wavelength about \(491\text{–}575\ \text{nm}\)).
• The blue ion \(Y\) appears blue because it absorbs orange light (complementary colour, wavelength about \(585\text{–}647\ \text{nm}\)).
• Green light has a shorter wavelength and higher frequency than orange light, so the photons it carries have higher energy.
Therefore, \(X\) absorbs radiation of higher energy than \(Y\).

(d)(i)
A suitable line of best fit is a straight line (or smooth curve) drawn through the plotted points on the absorbance–concentration graph with roughly equal numbers of points above and below the line, and without extrapolating far beyond the data.

(d)(ii)
Reading from the calibration line at an absorbance of \(0.090\) gives a concentration of about \(\boxed{9.2\ \text{ppm}}\) of \(\text{Ca}^{2+}\).
(Calculation idea: use the straight-line graph to interpolate the corresponding concentration between \(8.00\ \text{ppm}\) and \(10.0\ \text{ppm}\).)

(d)(iii)
Use \[ A = \log_{10}\!\left(\dfrac{I_{0}}{I}\right), \quad A = 0.090. \] First, find the ratio \(\dfrac{I_{0}}{I}\):
\[ \dfrac{I_{0}}{I} = 10^{A} = 10^{0.090} \approx 1.23. \] So \[ \dfrac{I}{I_{0}} = \dfrac{1}{1.23} \approx 0.813. \] This means about \(81.3\ \%\) of the light is transmitted, so the percentage absorbed is \[ 100 – 81.3 = 18.7\ \%. \] \(\boxed{\text{Percentage absorbed} \approx 18.7\ \%}\)

(d)(iv)
Use the dilution relationship \(C_{1} V_{1} = C_{2} V_{2}\).
Here \(C_{2} = 4.00\ \text{ppm}\), \(V_{2} = 25.00\ \text{cm}^{3}\), \(V_{1} = 2.00\ \text{cm}^{3}\).
\[ C_{1} = \dfrac{C_{2} V_{2}}{V_{1}} = \dfrac{4.00 \times 25.00}{2.00} = \dfrac{100.0}{2.00} = 50.0\ \text{ppm}. \] \(\boxed{C_{1} = 50.0\ \text{ppm}}\)

(d)(v)
A concentration of \(4.00\ \text{ppm}\) corresponds to \(4.00\ \text{mg}\) of \(\text{Ca}^{2+}\) per \(\text{dm}^{3}\):
\[ 4.00\ \text{ppm} = 4.00\ \text{mg dm}^{-3} = 4.00 \times 10^{-3}\ \text{g dm}^{-3}. \] The molar mass of calcium is approximately \(40.08\ \text{g mol}^{-1}\).
Moles of \(\text{Ca}^{2+}\) per \(\text{dm}^{3}\): \[ n = \dfrac{4.00 \times 10^{-3}}{40.08} \approx 9.98 \times 10^{-5}\ \text{mol dm}^{-3}. \] \(\boxed{[\text{Ca}^{2+}] \approx 9.98 \times 10^{-5}\ \text{mol dm}^{-3}}\)

Scroll to Top