IBDP Maths AA: Topic SL 3.2: Use of sine, cosine and tangent ratios : IB style Questions HL Paper 2

Note: Accept alternative notation for vectors (eg \(\langle a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c\rangle {\text{ or }}\left( {a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c} \right)\)).

\(\boldsymbol{n} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
  1 \\
  { – 2} \\
  { – 3}
\end{array}} \right)\) and \(\boldsymbol{m} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
  2 \\
  { – 1} \\
  { – 1}
\end{array}} \right)\)    (A1)

\(\cos \theta  = \frac{{\boldsymbol{n} \cdot \boldsymbol{m}}}{{\left| \boldsymbol{n} \right|\left| \boldsymbol{m} \right|}}\)     (M1)

\(\cos \theta  = \frac{{2 + 2 + 3}}{{\sqrt {1 + 4 + 9} \sqrt {4 + 1 + 1} }} = \frac{7}{{\sqrt {14} \sqrt 6 }}\)     A1

\(\theta  = 40.2^\circ \,\,\,\,\,(0.702{\text{ rad}})\)     A1

[4 marks]

Note: Accept alternative notation for vectors (eg \(\langle a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c\rangle {\text{ or }}\left( {a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c} \right)\)).

METHOD 1

eliminate z from x – 2y – 3z = 2 and 2x – y – z = k

\(5x – y = 3k – 2 \Rightarrow x = \frac{{y – (2 – 3k)}}{5}\)     M1A1

eliminate y from x – 2y – 3z = 2 and 2x – y – z = k

\(3x + z = 2k – 2 \Rightarrow x = \frac{{z – (2k – 2)}}{{ – 3}}\)     A1

x = t, y = (2 − 3k) + 5t and z = (2k − 2) − 3t     A1A1

\(r = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
0\\
{2 – 3k}\\
{2k – 2}
\end{array}} \right) + t\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
5\\
{ – 3}
\end{array}} \right)\)     AG

[5 marks]

METHOD 2

\(\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
{ – 2}\\
{ – 3}
\end{array}} \right) \times \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
2\\
{ – 1}\\
{ – 1}
\end{array}} \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ – 1}\\
{ – 5}\\
3
\end{array}} \right) \Rightarrow {\text{direction is }}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
5\\
{ – 3}
\end{array}} \right)\)     M1A1

Let x = 0

\(0 – 2y – 3z = 2{\text{ and }}2 \times 0 – y – z = k\)     (M1)

solve simultaneously     (M1)

\(y = 2 – 3k{\text{ and }}z = 2k – 2\)     A1

therefore r \( = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
0\\
{2 – 3k}\\
{2k – 2}
\end{array}} \right) + t\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
5\\
{ – 3}
\end{array}} \right)\)     AG

[5 marks]

METHOD 3

substitute \(x = t,{\text{ }}y = (2 – 3k) + 5t{\text{ and }}z = (2k – 2) – 3t{\text{ into }}{\pi _1}{\text{ and }}{\pi _2}\)     M1

for \({\pi _1}:t – 2(2 – 3k + 5t) – 3(2k – 2 – 3t) = 2\)     A1

for \({\pi _2}:2t – (2 – 3k + 5t) – (2k – 2 – 3t) = k\)     A1

the planes have a unique line of intersection     R2

therefore the line is \(r = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
0\\
{2 – 3k}\\
{2k – 2}
\end{array}} \right) + t\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
5\\
{ – 3}
\end{array}} \right)\)     AG

[5 marks]

Note: Accept alternative notation for vectors (eg \(\langle a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c\rangle {\text{ or }}\left( {a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c} \right)\)).

\(5 – t = (2 – 3k + 5t) + 3 = 2 – 2(2k – 2 – 3t)\)     M1A1

Note: Award M1A1 if candidates use vector or parametric equations of \({L_2}\)

eg \(\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
0\\
{2 – 3k}\\
{2k – 2}
\end{array}} \right) + t\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
5\\
{ – 3}
\end{array}} \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
5\\
{ – 3}\\
1
\end{array}} \right) + s\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ – 2}\\
2\\
{ – 1}
\end{array}} \right)\) or \( \Rightarrow \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{t = 5 – 2s}\\
{2 – 3k + 5t = – 3 + 2s}\\
{2k – 2 – 3t = 1 + s}
\end{array}} \right.\)

solve simultaneously     M1

\(k = 2,{\text{ }}t = 1{\text{ }}(s = 2)\)     A1

intersection point (\(1\), \(1\), \( – 1\))     A1

[5 marks]

Note: Accept alternative notation for vectors (eg \(\langle a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c\rangle {\text{ or }}\left( {a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c} \right)\)).

\({\overrightarrow l _2} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
2\\
{ – 2}\\
1
\end{array}} \right)\)     A1

\({\overrightarrow l _1} \times {\overrightarrow l _2} = \left| {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
\boldsymbol{i}&\boldsymbol{j}&\boldsymbol{k}\\
1&5&{ – 3}\\
2&{ – 2}&1
\end{array}} \right| = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ – 1}\\
{ – 7}\\
{ – 12}
\end{array}} \right)\)     (M1)A1

\(\boldsymbol{r} \cdot \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
7\\
{12}
\end{array}} \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
1\\
{ – 1}
\end{array}} \right) \cdot \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
7\\
{12}
\end{array}} \right)\)     (M1)

\(x + 7y + 12z = – 4\)     A1

[5 marks]

Note: Accept alternative notation for vectors (eg \(\langle a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c\rangle {\text{ or }}\left( {a{\text{, }}b{\text{, }}c} \right)\)).

Let \(\theta \) be the angle between the lines \({\overrightarrow l _1} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1\\
5\\
{ – 3}
\end{array}} \right)\) and \({\overrightarrow l _2} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
2\\
{ – 2}\\
1
\end{array}} \right)\)

\(\cos \theta  = \frac{{\left| {2 – 10 – 3} \right|}}{{\sqrt {35} \sqrt 9 }} \Rightarrow \theta  = 0.902334…{\text{ }}51.699…^\circ )\)     (M1)

as the triangle XYZ has a right angle at Y,

\({\text{XZ}} = a \Rightarrow {\text{YZ}} = a\sin \theta {\text{ and XY}} = a\cos \theta \)     (M1)

\({\text{area  =  3}} \Rightarrow \frac{{{a^2}\sin \theta \cos \theta }}{2} = 3\)     (M1)

\(a = 3.5122…\)     (A1)

perimeter \( = a + a\sin \theta  + a\cos \theta  = 8.44537… = 8.45\)     A1

Note: If candidates attempt to find coordinates of Y and Z award M1 for expression of vector YZ in terms of two parameters, M1 for attempt to use perpendicular condition to determine relation between parameters, M1 for attempt to use the area to find the parameters and A2 for final answer.

[5 marks]

Although this was the last question in part B, it was answered surprisingly well by many candidates, except for part (e). Even those who had not done so well elsewhere often gained a number of marks in some parts of the question. Nevertheless the presence of parameters seemed to have blocked the abilities of weaker candidates to solve situations in which vectors were involved. Mathematical skills for this particular question were sometimes remarkable, however, calculations proved incomplete due to the way that planes were presented. Most candidates found a correct angle in part (a). Occasional arithmetic errors in calculating the magnitude of a vector and dot product occurred. In part (b) the vector product approach was popular. In some case candidates simply verified the result by substitution. There was a lot of simultaneous equation solving, much of which was not very pretty. In part (c), a number of candidates made errors when attempting to solve a system of equations involving parameters. Many of the results for the point were found in terms of k. It was notorious that candidates did not use their GDC to try to find the coordinates of the intersection point between lines. In part (d), a number of candidates used an incorrect point but this part was often done well. 

Very few excellent answers to part (e) were seen using an efficient method. Most candidates attempted methods involving heavy algebraic manipulation and had little success in this part of the question.

Although this was the last question in part B, it was answered surprisingly well by many candidates, except for part (e). Even those who had not done so well elsewhere often gained a number of marks in some parts of the question. Nevertheless the presence of parameters seemed to have blocked the abilities of weaker candidates to solve situations in which vectors were involved. Mathematical skills for this particular question were sometimes remarkable, however, calculations proved incomplete due to the way that planes were presented. Most candidates found a correct angle in part (a). Occasional arithmetic errors in calculating the magnitude of a vector and dot product occurred. In part (b) the vector product approach was popular. In some case candidates simply verified the result by substitution. There was a lot of simultaneous equation solving, much of which was not very pretty. In part (c), a number of candidates made errors when attempting to solve a system of equations involving parameters. Many of the results for the point were found in terms of k. It was notorious that candidates did not use their GDC to try to find the coordinates of the intersection point between lines. In part (d), a number of candidates used an incorrect point but this part was often done well. 

Very few excellent answers to part (e) were seen using an efficient method. Most candidates attempted methods involving heavy algebraic manipulation and had little success in this part of the question.

Although this was the last question in part B, it was answered surprisingly well by many candidates, except for part (e). Even those who had not done so well elsewhere often gained a number of marks in some parts of the question. Nevertheless the presence of parameters seemed to have blocked the abilities of weaker candidates to solve situations in which vectors were involved. Mathematical skills for this particular question were sometimes remarkable, however, calculations proved incomplete due to the way that planes were presented. Most candidates found a correct angle in part (a). Occasional arithmetic errors in calculating the magnitude of a vector and dot product occurred. In part (b) the vector product approach was popular. In some case candidates simply verified the result by substitution. There was a lot of simultaneous equation solving, much of which was not very pretty. In part (c), a number of candidates made errors when attempting to solve a system of equations involving parameters. Many of the results for the point were found in terms of k. It was notorious that candidates did not use their GDC to try to find the coordinates of the intersection point between lines. In part (d), a number of candidates used an incorrect point but this part was often done well. 

Very few excellent answers to part (e) were seen using an efficient method. Most candidates attempted methods involving heavy algebraic manipulation and had little success in this part of the question.

Although this was the last question in part B, it was answered surprisingly well by many candidates, except for part (e). Even those who had not done so well elsewhere often gained a number of marks in some parts of the question. Nevertheless the presence of parameters seemed to have blocked the abilities of weaker candidates to solve situations in which vectors were involved. Mathematical skills for this particular question were sometimes remarkable, however, calculations proved incomplete due to the way that planes were presented. Most candidates found a correct angle in part (a). Occasional arithmetic errors in calculating the magnitude of a vector and dot product occurred. In part (b) the vector product approach was popular. In some case candidates simply verified the result by substitution. There was a lot of simultaneous equation solving, much of which was not very pretty. In part (c), a number of candidates made errors when attempting to solve a system of equations involving parameters. Many of the results for the point were found in terms of k. It was notorious that candidates did not use their GDC to try to find the coordinates of the intersection point between lines. In part (d), a number of candidates used an incorrect point but this part was often done well. 

Very few excellent answers to part (e) were seen using an efficient method. Most candidates attempted methods involving heavy algebraic manipulation and had little success in this part of the question.

Although this was the last question in part B, it was answered surprisingly well by many candidates, except for part (e). Even those who had not done so well elsewhere often gained a number of marks in some parts of the question. Nevertheless the presence of parameters seemed to have blocked the abilities of weaker candidates to solve situations in which vectors were involved. Mathematical skills for this particular question were sometimes remarkable, however, calculations proved incomplete due to the way that planes were presented. Most candidates found a correct angle in part (a). Occasional arithmetic errors in calculating the magnitude of a vector and dot product occurred. In part (b) the vector product approach was popular. In some case candidates simply verified the result by substitution. There was a lot of simultaneous equation solving, much of which was not very pretty. In part (c), a number of candidates made errors when attempting to solve a system of equations involving parameters. Many of the results for the point were found in terms of k. It was notorious that candidates did not use their GDC to try to find the coordinates of the intersection point between lines. In part (d), a number of candidates used an incorrect point but this part was often done well. 

Very few excellent answers to part (e) were seen using an efficient method. Most candidates attempted methods involving heavy algebraic manipulation and had little success in this part of the question.